Comments on: Shenzhen Stock Exchange by OMA

By: nique

nique — Mon, 21 Jan 2008 04:24:01 +0000

i believe going simple but nice is the current trend in china. but OMA’s approach towards architecture has been quite fascinating. he re-thinks a lot of projects these days. but sad to say, this is not one of them. its just the same as my design studio project!! wakakaka..

By: young7777

young7777 — Tue, 04 Dec 2007 18:55:59 +0000

I don’t understand how OMA won the competition with this design and even worst I REALLY don’t get how ShenZhen government decided to go with this design. Box shape building would be aesthetic as well like the Museum of Contemporary Art New York. But this exchange building is not at the same league. SAD SAD SAD. These days Chinese have spent a lot of money on some expensive but ugly buildings, another example is the Beijing CCTV towers.

By: Het

Het — Tue, 04 Dec 2007 00:53:54 +0000

Does Rem just not care anymore? Or is OMA hiring preschoolers to design their buildings these days? (death to the diagram!)

By: abeer

abeer — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 06:54:14 +0000

no matter what they do in dezin,but their presentations r good enough

By: O.G.

O.G. — Sun, 25 Nov 2007 21:58:51 +0000

Rem Koolhaas is an original head-bussa.