Comments on: OMA in Singapore

By: O+O_S1

O+O_S1 — Mon, 09 Feb 2009 16:53:41 +0000

what i’ve seen here are a bunch of container vans, WTH…this project may only good in narrative promotion…you cannot fool people who understand what designs really means, i mean really good design!!!

By: RTA

RTA — Sat, 12 Apr 2008 10:38:00 +0000

ONE SHOULD CHECK THE PROJECT ANARCITY IN… 2005 FROM….MVRDV.
WHAT ARE THE TEAM LEADERS PLAYING TO?

By: W.B.

W.B. — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:42:35 +0000

How many ways can OMA arrange boxes before it gets old?

By: james

james — Sat, 09 Feb 2008 13:33:53 +0000

Have you seen the client “CapitaLand”, probably some 1000 new phsycological depressing apartments on the earth. When will post-modernism learn? if its keeps referring to Modernism and even doesen’t learn from the mistakes.

By: Arch

Arch — Thu, 07 Feb 2008 05:09:25 +0000

Singapore is smart, they are hiring OMA and Hadid. They know how to invest!

By: Oxotnic.nl

Oxotnic.nl — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 22:27:31 +0000

Seagrut seems to know a lot!

By: LH

LH — Tue, 05 Feb 2008 23:19:43 +0000

can any of you imagine living in it?

By: seagrut

seagrut — Tue, 05 Feb 2008 22:40:50 +0000

It is not the shape of a residential complex that turns it into a slum, it is its insertion into the urban context plus the range of amenities and activities present that turn a neighbourhood into a succes or not. You are all just commenting a shape that you have not even looked at too well i must say… has any of you thought of what these buildings would like like from the ground?? and would you still call them Bijlmer then? not even remotely!

By: Architecture Nowadays...

Architecture Nowadays... — Tue, 05 Feb 2008 17:14:51 +0000

The great new forms of living badly?

By: kurosheep

kurosheep — Mon, 04 Feb 2008 05:43:12 +0000

Time to dig up those books from the 60s, boys and girls. Koolhaas will write about the Japanese Metabolists next.