Comments on: St Paul’s Way by Fashion Architecture Taste

By: shkar

shkar — Sun, 13 Jul 2008 20:40:03 +0000

i feel to this project really i opinion non beauty but idea contains important knew movement and simpify

By: shkar

shkar — Sun, 13 Jul 2008 20:29:06 +0000

i like to submit like an architect that we disscussion about architect and about theory for architect

By: meh

meh — Tue, 08 Apr 2008 10:53:27 +0000

“eyeontheworld Says:
I also think it quite strange that, in order to help justify the ‘green gateway’ statement, they needed to superimpose trees. Would this be because in this area of London there isn’t any, and it is certainly not green, rather drab and run down.”

one can only assume you’ve not paid Mile End a visit (or indeed that you even read this article ) as the block itself will be opposite Mile End Park, as it states above. Now, parks, even ones in rundown ol’ east london, do tend to have at least a bit of green. Trees too!

It’s also about a 5 minute walk from a ten acre woodland, the only woodland in East London, and god knows how many other parks and open spaces. fair enough, the green is punctuated by large swathes of grey and brown and other the “drab” hues but for all it’s faults, the east end, Mile End included, is enormously spoiled for green space.

As for the building itself, well, I’m not taken by how it looks so far. I’m even less convinced as to how livable it would be. But please, whatever your opinion, at least know your subject before wading in and talking bollocks…

By: leandro locsin

leandro locsin — Tue, 01 Apr 2008 19:25:41 +0000

FAT Architects has always been one SERIOUS UGLY. they belong to tabloids and never on design columns.

By: poppins

poppins — Tue, 01 Apr 2008 17:04:20 +0000

i like that its there own fresh style, but it has to be said that its fat gone one step too far. forget renderings, and forget your own judgmental egos, just imagine what it would be like to live in there…you’d be calling in the renovation team asap!

By: Per Corell

Per Corell — Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:03:54 +0000

Sad architecture is still caught in seing the building as a picture of what could be cutting edge structural newthinking — as much this looks as a 3dh ,it rather display it as a picture and again, omit the structural core, the real move into a new architecture.
Look up 3dh and you will know what I say — but I guess 3dh ask a bit more guts. — Guess 3dh realy are 20 years ahead of it’s time.

By: joe

joe — Tue, 25 Mar 2008 04:15:33 +0000

yeah icon magazine and dezeen have a ‘relationship’ with FAT. ins’t that what the london design scene is all about- friends and connections getting you exposure when real work and talent fails. champagne anyone…

By: razif

razif — Sat, 22 Mar 2008 21:30:09 +0000

please .. enough of random images of so called superstar designers.. it’s spoiling my students mind… FAT gone BAD.

By: DASDAS

DASDAS — Sat, 22 Mar 2008 13:52:35 +0000

Tracy, well, post something good then.. and we’ll have good comments about it.

By: tracy

tracy — Sat, 22 Mar 2008 05:47:53 +0000

all you design folks are such negative nancy’s - shut the fuck up all of you. every comment on every post has some negative bitchy comment - grow up