<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Local River by Mathieu Lehanneur 2</title>
	<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/05/10/local-river-by-mathieu-lehanneur-2/</link>
	<description>architecture and design magazine</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 04:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: lc</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/05/10/local-river-by-mathieu-lehanneur-2/#comment-148501</link>
		<dc:creator>lc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 04:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/05/10/local-river-by-mathieu-lehanneur-2/#comment-148501</guid>
		<description>I had never heard of aquaponics until this post (well actually the earlier post on Local River). My first thoughts? How to do it better. Theres a link on the other post's set of comments for the real deal - http://www.aquaponics.net.au/ This is a fantastic idea! Just think of all the ways it can be developed! Maybe something along the lines of a large facility in the center of a metropolitan area? I could write at length, but to the point - less humbug and more idea shareing.

(And yes, the glass jars are a little dopey looking)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had never heard of aquaponics until this post (well actually the earlier post on Local River). My first thoughts? How to do it better. Theres a link on the other post&#8217;s set of comments for the real deal - <a href="http://www.aquaponics.net.au/" rel="nofollow">http://www.aquaponics.net.au/</a> This is a fantastic idea! Just think of all the ways it can be developed! Maybe something along the lines of a large facility in the center of a metropolitan area? I could write at length, but to the point - less humbug and more idea shareing.</p>
<p>(And yes, the glass jars are a little dopey looking)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ellimsg</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/05/10/local-river-by-mathieu-lehanneur-2/#comment-144196</link>
		<dc:creator>ellimsg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/05/10/local-river-by-mathieu-lehanneur-2/#comment-144196</guid>
		<description>Mr Lehanneur is shamelessly courting publicity. 

Just call it a flower pot and aquarium tank.  Don't pretend otherwise. Come on... grow your own food in containers as lame as these????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr Lehanneur is shamelessly courting publicity. </p>
<p>Just call it a flower pot and aquarium tank.  Don&#8217;t pretend otherwise. Come on&#8230; grow your own food in containers as lame as these????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andi</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/05/10/local-river-by-mathieu-lehanneur-2/#comment-143919</link>
		<dc:creator>andi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 09:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/05/10/local-river-by-mathieu-lehanneur-2/#comment-143919</guid>
		<description>God. I really don't want to be aquanted to the fish i'm eating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God. I really don&#8217;t want to be aquanted to the fish i&#8217;m eating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raven sati</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/05/10/local-river-by-mathieu-lehanneur-2/#comment-127249</link>
		<dc:creator>raven sati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 13:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/05/10/local-river-by-mathieu-lehanneur-2/#comment-127249</guid>
		<description>Bonzo !  Yes !  lets get together and eat dog !   I have lots of avaiable livestock in the lane by my house in Bangkok</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bonzo !  Yes !  lets get together and eat dog !   I have lots of avaiable livestock in the lane by my house in Bangkok</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yves</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/05/10/local-river-by-mathieu-lehanneur-2/#comment-126529</link>
		<dc:creator>yves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 02:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/05/10/local-river-by-mathieu-lehanneur-2/#comment-126529</guid>
		<description>well Bonzo,

this is just a concept. No need to get angry because it is not effective. I mean how many other posts on this website are designed to benefit this struggling world? They are most if not all pointless.

No need to over exaggerate and be a troll.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well Bonzo,</p>
<p>this is just a concept. No need to get angry because it is not effective. I mean how many other posts on this website are designed to benefit this struggling world? They are most if not all pointless.</p>
<p>No need to over exaggerate and be a troll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bonzo</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/05/10/local-river-by-mathieu-lehanneur-2/#comment-123880</link>
		<dc:creator>Bonzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 13:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/05/10/local-river-by-mathieu-lehanneur-2/#comment-123880</guid>
		<description>Joaquin
So drug designers for instance, or car designers, or airplane designers, they are allowed to just "take action" and watch the 'reaction'? Or do these industries consider the brief carefully and research and publish/produce only when they are quite assured that they have reached a reasonable conclusion? I object to over simplification and lazy responses. You either take it seriously; or you do not. If you do not take important issues seriously, if you choose to publish something not even quarter baked - fine. But be prepared for approporiate 'idiotic' criticism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joaquin<br />
So drug designers for instance, or car designers, or airplane designers, they are allowed to just &#8220;take action&#8221; and watch the &#8216;reaction&#8217;? Or do these industries consider the brief carefully and research and publish/produce only when they are quite assured that they have reached a reasonable conclusion? I object to over simplification and lazy responses. You either take it seriously; or you do not. If you do not take important issues seriously, if you choose to publish something not even quarter baked - fine. But be prepared for approporiate &#8216;idiotic&#8217; criticism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zuy</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/05/10/local-river-by-mathieu-lehanneur-2/#comment-123858</link>
		<dc:creator>zuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 11:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/05/10/local-river-by-mathieu-lehanneur-2/#comment-123858</guid>
		<description>He is on the cover of the french design magazine Intramuros ( text also in english)
http://www.intramuros.fr/nportrait1.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He is on the cover of the french design magazine Intramuros ( text also in english)<br />
<a href="http://www.intramuros.fr/nportrait1.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.intramuros.fr/nportrait1.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mule</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/05/10/local-river-by-mathieu-lehanneur-2/#comment-123831</link>
		<dc:creator>mule</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 09:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/05/10/local-river-by-mathieu-lehanneur-2/#comment-123831</guid>
		<description>You could also said that the vase looks like this
http://equatorlive.com/blogs/jjjj/files/2007/11/hayon-wingback.jpg
Who is copying who?  Hayon copied Bourollec?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could also said that the vase looks like this<br />
<a href="http://equatorlive.com/blogs/jjjj/files/2007/11/hayon-wingback.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://equatorlive.com/blogs/jjjj/files/2007/11/hayon-wingback.jpg</a><br />
Who is copying who?  Hayon copied Bourollec?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zuy</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/05/10/local-river-by-mathieu-lehanneur-2/#comment-123799</link>
		<dc:creator>zuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 07:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/05/10/local-river-by-mathieu-lehanneur-2/#comment-123799</guid>
		<description>lehanneur is french but do not follow Starck... he is in one  future of design</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lehanneur is french but do not follow Starck&#8230; he is in one  future of design</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joaquin</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/05/10/local-river-by-mathieu-lehanneur-2/#comment-123759</link>
		<dc:creator>Joaquin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 05:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/05/10/local-river-by-mathieu-lehanneur-2/#comment-123759</guid>
		<description>@J...I do agree.  Maybe it's yet not the best idea, but what matters is the designer took an action.  And actions create reactions which eventually create more actions and so forth.  

A world's a better place when people keep pushing for the better.  Ben Franklin had a point when he flew a kite with a key in the midst of the storm.  And you would have laughed at his stupid experiment.  Perhaps all pessimists in Dezeen should learn to start shaping their critics into something concrete and show us how they can come up with something better here (if they can come up with something at all), or at least learn the term 'good critics.'  

Negative, pointless critics which suggest no alternatives are idiotic, and should be put aside.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@J&#8230;I do agree.  Maybe it&#8217;s yet not the best idea, but what matters is the designer took an action.  And actions create reactions which eventually create more actions and so forth.  </p>
<p>A world&#8217;s a better place when people keep pushing for the better.  Ben Franklin had a point when he flew a kite with a key in the midst of the storm.  And you would have laughed at his stupid experiment.  Perhaps all pessimists in Dezeen should learn to start shaping their critics into something concrete and show us how they can come up with something better here (if they can come up with something at all), or at least learn the term &#8216;good critics.&#8217;  </p>
<p>Negative, pointless critics which suggest no alternatives are idiotic, and should be put aside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
