Comments on: Casa per tutti at Milan Triennale

By: Rob

Rob — Mon, 19 Apr 2010 23:18:55 +0000

I could be wrong …. but this really is a waste of money. None of these are practical, none are feasible and the travel was a waste of carbon. It will help nobody so why must it pretend to justify itself with a social objective ?

When design masquerades as being a pretty cure for inequality and a sop to a lack of responsible social policy design helps nobody. This is architectural voyeurism, irresponsible and distasteful.

Would it not just have been more honest to declare it’s purpose to have been “Travel-a-couple-of thousand-miles-and-bring-your-Shed-Expo”

By: Josh

Josh — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:55:47 +0000

P.S. The Mad Housers are the exception, they obviously know what they are doing. And as someone who has been homeless, I honestly thank you – Even if you may never read it :)

By: Josh

Josh — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:50:31 +0000

I could not really see how these could be viably used to combat homelessness. Too many materials, not durable..
Have any of these designers been on the other side of the track?
Artistic, aesthetically pleasing and useless.

By: Bozo III

Bozo III — Wed, 28 May 2008 14:06:52 +0000

No, this is the real Bozo.

These houses are awful. A real clown does not like to live in a house made of clothes, especially if he is a naturalist.

By: Bozo II

Bozo II — Wed, 28 May 2008 14:05:52 +0000

This is the real Bozo… shut ut you fake Bozo’s

These houses are great, even for me a real clown!