<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wedgwoodn’t by Michael Eden</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dezeen.com/2008/05/27/wedgwoodnt-by-michael-eden/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/05/27/wedgwoodnt-by-michael-eden/</link>
	<description>architecture and design magazine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:21:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Greco</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/05/27/wedgwoodnt-by-michael-eden/comment-page-1/#comment-133434</link>
		<dc:creator>El Greco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 21:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/2008/05/27/wedgwoodnt-by-michael-eden/#comment-133434</guid>
		<description>Excellent manufacturing technique.

Interesting coral-like patterns.

Post-modern reference a bit tired.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent manufacturing technique.</p>
<p>Interesting coral-like patterns.</p>
<p>Post-modern reference a bit tired.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joaquin</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/05/27/wedgwoodnt-by-michael-eden/comment-page-1/#comment-131753</link>
		<dc:creator>Joaquin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 08:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/2008/05/27/wedgwoodnt-by-michael-eden/#comment-131753</guid>
		<description>Emerson:  I agree.  Fling:  I disagree.  These are experimental objects, named after the Wedgewood.  You don&#039;t expect ur grandparents to buy Starck&#039;s collections rite?   If Dezeen posts a very functional item or architecture, u guys wud dub &#039;em boring still.  I guess it&#039;s those who still stick to functionalism who&#039;s ancient, say, Adolf Loo&#039;s children?

This guy&#039;s majoring ceramic, which means he&#039;s more an artist, and as much as I believe a design must be functional, I can&#039;t find a single &#039;design&#039; word in the excerpt.

Most importantly, it&#039;s how you analyze each project.  This is a transitional project, experimental and thought provoking!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Emerson:  I agree.  Fling:  I disagree.  These are experimental objects, named after the Wedgewood.  You don&#8217;t expect ur grandparents to buy Starck&#8217;s collections rite?   If Dezeen posts a very functional item or architecture, u guys wud dub &#8216;em boring still.  I guess it&#8217;s those who still stick to functionalism who&#8217;s ancient, say, Adolf Loo&#8217;s children?</p>
<p>This guy&#8217;s majoring ceramic, which means he&#8217;s more an artist, and as much as I believe a design must be functional, I can&#8217;t find a single &#8216;design&#8217; word in the excerpt.</p>
<p>Most importantly, it&#8217;s how you analyze each project.  This is a transitional project, experimental and thought provoking!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tiffany</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/05/27/wedgwoodnt-by-michael-eden/comment-page-1/#comment-131495</link>
		<dc:creator>tiffany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 19:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/2008/05/27/wedgwoodnt-by-michael-eden/#comment-131495</guid>
		<description>Emerson: Yes, my parents use Wedgewood. And if you design something like this it&#039;s worse than the original. Only a brain older than my parents, say late 19th century, can come up with something this bourgeois, which totally lacks of creativity and intelligence. Stap back in the past. Real antique is better</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Emerson: Yes, my parents use Wedgewood. And if you design something like this it&#8217;s worse than the original. Only a brain older than my parents, say late 19th century, can come up with something this bourgeois, which totally lacks of creativity and intelligence. Stap back in the past. Real antique is better</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edward</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/05/27/wedgwoodnt-by-michael-eden/comment-page-1/#comment-131400</link>
		<dc:creator>edward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 15:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/2008/05/27/wedgwoodnt-by-michael-eden/#comment-131400</guid>
		<description>Duh...lookit, that thing won&#039;t hold water!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duh&#8230;lookit, that thing won&#8217;t hold water!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emerson</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/05/27/wedgwoodnt-by-michael-eden/comment-page-1/#comment-131160</link>
		<dc:creator>Emerson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 01:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/2008/05/27/wedgwoodnt-by-michael-eden/#comment-131160</guid>
		<description>Has anyone ever used a Wedgewood item for anything? Past or present? This is a fashion item. Do you really think the fact that it cannot hold liquid is an oversight? Are you people insane?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone ever used a Wedgewood item for anything? Past or present? This is a fashion item. Do you really think the fact that it cannot hold liquid is an oversight? Are you people insane?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
