Comments on: Roman Road conversion by Anarchitect http://www.dezeen.com/2008/07/02/roman-road-conversion-by-anarchitect/ architecture and design magazine Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:19:17 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Billy http://www.dezeen.com/2008/07/02/roman-road-conversion-by-anarchitect/comment-page-1/#comment-147316 Billy Thu, 03 Jul 2008 09:49:39 +0000 http://www.dezeen.com/2008/07/02/roman-road-conversion-by-anarchitect/#comment-147316 These guys do all the Vivienne Westwood shops which really look great. All architectural projects will have some quality issues, even Foster etc These guys do all the Vivienne Westwood shops which really look great. All architectural projects will have some quality issues, even Foster etc

]]> By: Dariusz http://www.dezeen.com/2008/07/02/roman-road-conversion-by-anarchitect/comment-page-1/#comment-147268 Dariusz Thu, 03 Jul 2008 07:52:04 +0000 http://www.dezeen.com/2008/07/02/roman-road-conversion-by-anarchitect/#comment-147268 I love it.. Congrats on turning such a small space into something really nice! :) Love the architectonics of it. nice place for a bbq, if there's enough sunshine.. london is tight! :) I love it.. Congrats on turning such a small space into something really nice! :) Love the architectonics of it. nice place for a bbq, if there’s enough sunshine.. london is tight! :)

]]> By: jed_ http://www.dezeen.com/2008/07/02/roman-road-conversion-by-anarchitect/comment-page-1/#comment-147096 jed_ Wed, 02 Jul 2008 23:47:40 +0000 http://www.dezeen.com/2008/07/02/roman-road-conversion-by-anarchitect/#comment-147096 also, just look at their website. how can you not love that?! also, just look at their website. how can you not love that?!

]]> By: jed_ http://www.dezeen.com/2008/07/02/roman-road-conversion-by-anarchitect/comment-page-1/#comment-147092 jed_ Wed, 02 Jul 2008 23:40:56 +0000 http://www.dezeen.com/2008/07/02/roman-road-conversion-by-anarchitect/#comment-147092 re: my first paragraph, it could just be the photos that give the impression of poor build quality. think it's great on the whole. well done Anarchitect. re: my first paragraph, it could just be the photos that give the impression of poor build quality. think it’s great on the whole. well done Anarchitect.

]]> By: jed_ http://www.dezeen.com/2008/07/02/roman-road-conversion-by-anarchitect/comment-page-1/#comment-147090 jed_ Wed, 02 Jul 2008 23:38:52 +0000 http://www.dezeen.com/2008/07/02/roman-road-conversion-by-anarchitect/#comment-147090 good work but the stairs seem like a serious lapse of taste. the build quality seems not great either: the shuttering seems out of alignment at points and the shutters fully open on the top window on the first image seem to sag a bit. i know these things are hard to get built well i the UK and i salute these guys for realising a truly interesting design. it reminds me of some of the recent japanese courtyard houses with some scarpa and influences from georgian architecture thrown in to the pot. what program do you think they used for those renders? i'm looking for something for mac that has that quality but i have yet to find it. good work but the stairs seem like a serious lapse of taste. the build quality seems not great either: the shuttering seems out of alignment at points and the shutters fully open on the top window on the first image seem to sag a bit.

i know these things are hard to get built well i the UK and i salute these guys for realising a truly interesting design.

it reminds me of some of the recent japanese courtyard houses with some scarpa and influences from georgian architecture thrown in to the pot.

what program do you think they used for those renders? i’m looking for something for mac that has that quality but i have yet to find it.

]]> By: edward http://www.dezeen.com/2008/07/02/roman-road-conversion-by-anarchitect/comment-page-1/#comment-147087 edward Wed, 02 Jul 2008 23:31:10 +0000 http://www.dezeen.com/2008/07/02/roman-road-conversion-by-anarchitect/#comment-147087 I like the ad hoc approach to the additions. Nothing fussy or formal. Not enough shown to say more. I like the ad hoc approach to the additions. Nothing fussy or formal. Not enough shown to say more.

]]>