<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Post Rotterdam by UNStudio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dezeen.com/2008/07/28/post-rotterdam-by-unstudio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/07/28/post-rotterdam-by-unstudio/</link>
	<description>architecture and design magazine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 10:20:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joppe</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/07/28/post-rotterdam-by-unstudio/comment-page-1/#comment-162637</link>
		<dc:creator>Joppe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 20:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/2008/07/28/post-rotterdam-by-unstudio/#comment-162637</guid>
		<description>I miss the McDonalds at the corner of the Coolsingel and the Meent. I guess the whitewashed building doesn&#039;t allow such frivolous structures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I miss the McDonalds at the corner of the Coolsingel and the Meent. I guess the whitewashed building doesn&#8217;t allow such frivolous structures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: One</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/07/28/post-rotterdam-by-unstudio/comment-page-1/#comment-161623</link>
		<dc:creator>One</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/2008/07/28/post-rotterdam-by-unstudio/#comment-161623</guid>
		<description>The building went beyond the notion of boxes, which is the statent of this project, I believe. Convention on ugryness is also abandoned to make space for new geometry. I feel the building needs another rather thick constructive elements within, and that is alarming as architecture. It remind me of UN&#039;s manifest on Manhappan project which was disappointing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The building went beyond the notion of boxes, which is the statent of this project, I believe. Convention on ugryness is also abandoned to make space for new geometry. I feel the building needs another rather thick constructive elements within, and that is alarming as architecture. It remind me of UN&#8217;s manifest on Manhappan project which was disappointing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabs</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/07/28/post-rotterdam-by-unstudio/comment-page-1/#comment-161208</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/2008/07/28/post-rotterdam-by-unstudio/#comment-161208</guid>
		<description>Another set of dull rhino renderings</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another set of dull rhino renderings</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/07/28/post-rotterdam-by-unstudio/comment-page-1/#comment-161034</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/2008/07/28/post-rotterdam-by-unstudio/#comment-161034</guid>
		<description>Frank,

- I am quite surprised that you are about to judge categorize architecture by &quot;box&quot; vs. &quot;form&quot;. To be honest this is quite provincial.

- What do you mean by &quot;architecture can be more&quot; - formal expression? I think you are reducing architecture to its visual qualities (which reduces architecture to about 10% of what it is or could be).

- By saying that a &quot;building is beautiful in its formal difference&quot; you express that this project would be different. Different to what? There are hundreds of projects like this being designed in Europe, Asia, Amerika... in my opinion this project is a generic design taking advantage of computer skills.

To conclude I would say that I also do not like over-intellectualized boxes. But what I also do not like are buildings that are totally arbitrary in their formal expression.

When comes the point when the public discourse on architecture goes beyond box vs. blob?
I would rather like to discuss whether a project is unique or generic...this design is not bad, but clearly not unique...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank,</p>
<p>- I am quite surprised that you are about to judge categorize architecture by &#8220;box&#8221; vs. &#8220;form&#8221;. To be honest this is quite provincial.</p>
<p>- What do you mean by &#8220;architecture can be more&#8221; &#8211; formal expression? I think you are reducing architecture to its visual qualities (which reduces architecture to about 10% of what it is or could be).</p>
<p>- By saying that a &#8220;building is beautiful in its formal difference&#8221; you express that this project would be different. Different to what? There are hundreds of projects like this being designed in Europe, Asia, Amerika&#8230; in my opinion this project is a generic design taking advantage of computer skills.</p>
<p>To conclude I would say that I also do not like over-intellectualized boxes. But what I also do not like are buildings that are totally arbitrary in their formal expression.</p>
<p>When comes the point when the public discourse on architecture goes beyond box vs. blob?<br />
I would rather like to discuss whether a project is unique or generic&#8230;this design is not bad, but clearly not unique&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olegger</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/07/28/post-rotterdam-by-unstudio/comment-page-1/#comment-161020</link>
		<dc:creator>Olegger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/2008/07/28/post-rotterdam-by-unstudio/#comment-161020</guid>
		<description>Not a post office but an iPod thing :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not a post office but an iPod thing <img src='http://www.dezeen.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank-3</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/07/28/post-rotterdam-by-unstudio/comment-page-1/#comment-160789</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank-3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/2008/07/28/post-rotterdam-by-unstudio/#comment-160789</guid>
		<description>It is the same comments everytime a project that has a &quot;skin&quot; or is &quot;curved&quot; is posted. When will people get out of their modernist box mentality and realize that architecture can be more? While I agree some of these projects seem to lack a reasoning behind the form, I simply don&#039;t care! I would rather see a building that is beautiful in its formal difference than another over-intellectualized box.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is the same comments everytime a project that has a &#8220;skin&#8221; or is &#8220;curved&#8221; is posted. When will people get out of their modernist box mentality and realize that architecture can be more? While I agree some of these projects seem to lack a reasoning behind the form, I simply don&#8217;t care! I would rather see a building that is beautiful in its formal difference than another over-intellectualized box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JUST COOL Design Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/07/28/post-rotterdam-by-unstudio/comment-page-1/#comment-160785</link>
		<dc:creator>JUST COOL Design Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 23:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/2008/07/28/post-rotterdam-by-unstudio/#comment-160785</guid>
		<description>an ambitious task - i hope the post office has a clock this time</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>an ambitious task &#8211; i hope the post office has a clock this time</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pEDRO</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/07/28/post-rotterdam-by-unstudio/comment-page-1/#comment-160744</link>
		<dc:creator>pEDRO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/2008/07/28/post-rotterdam-by-unstudio/#comment-160744</guid>
		<description>The dead of architecture part _ (you complete)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The dead of architecture part _ (you complete)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kuba</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/07/28/post-rotterdam-by-unstudio/comment-page-1/#comment-160512</link>
		<dc:creator>kuba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/2008/07/28/post-rotterdam-by-unstudio/#comment-160512</guid>
		<description>Fair point Tim   - the original post office is far from white and whiteness seems to be the only thing that unites the two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair point Tim   &#8211; the original post office is far from white and whiteness seems to be the only thing that unites the two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/07/28/post-rotterdam-by-unstudio/comment-page-1/#comment-160296</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/2008/07/28/post-rotterdam-by-unstudio/#comment-160296</guid>
		<description>universal lattice... my guess a recent graduate of Ali Rahim is working at UN</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>universal lattice&#8230; my guess a recent graduate of Ali Rahim is working at UN</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>