<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Olympic viewing platform by Office for Subversive Architecture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dezeen.com/2008/08/12/point-of-view-by-office-for-subversive-architecture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/08/12/point-of-view-by-office-for-subversive-architecture/</link>
	<description>architecture and design magazine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:19:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joolzy</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/08/12/point-of-view-by-office-for-subversive-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-170101</link>
		<dc:creator>Joolzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 05:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/2008/08/12/point-of-view-by-office-for-subversive-architecture/#comment-170101</guid>
		<description>Oh come on.......

I work for a theatre company and build stuff like this for sets every week.

&quot;the stair-like platform was created in collaboration with Blueprint magazine&quot;

stair-like?!? THEY ARE JUST STAIRS!! and why, for the love of god, would they need to collaborate with another company to come up with something like this?!

It just doesn&#039;t make sense...Am i missing something here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh come on&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>I work for a theatre company and build stuff like this for sets every week.</p>
<p>&#8220;the stair-like platform was created in collaboration with Blueprint magazine&#8221;</p>
<p>stair-like?!? THEY ARE JUST STAIRS!! and why, for the love of god, would they need to collaborate with another company to come up with something like this?!</p>
<p>It just doesn&#8217;t make sense&#8230;Am i missing something here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tp</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/08/12/point-of-view-by-office-for-subversive-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-166837</link>
		<dc:creator>Tp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 20:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/2008/08/12/point-of-view-by-office-for-subversive-architecture/#comment-166837</guid>
		<description>The green yard of the other side, it`s always better......for sure!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The green yard of the other side, it`s always better&#8230;&#8230;for sure!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zuy</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/08/12/point-of-view-by-office-for-subversive-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-166327</link>
		<dc:creator>zuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 08:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/2008/08/12/point-of-view-by-office-for-subversive-architecture/#comment-166327</guid>
		<description>is my comment  stopped by the wall of moderation???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is my comment  stopped by the wall of moderation???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: niels</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/08/12/point-of-view-by-office-for-subversive-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-166203</link>
		<dc:creator>niels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 20:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/2008/08/12/point-of-view-by-office-for-subversive-architecture/#comment-166203</guid>
		<description>I like it a lot because of the architectural gesture it makes, the way people can look just above the wall, not making the contents behind it overevident, it keeps the mystery, you can even see this in the posts on this forum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like it a lot because of the architectural gesture it makes, the way people can look just above the wall, not making the contents behind it overevident, it keeps the mystery, you can even see this in the posts on this forum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Honkie</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/08/12/point-of-view-by-office-for-subversive-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-165982</link>
		<dc:creator>Honkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 05:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/2008/08/12/point-of-view-by-office-for-subversive-architecture/#comment-165982</guid>
		<description>beijing had a fence you could like look through, it was a really cool concept; what&#039;s to hide?  Free East London.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>beijing had a fence you could like look through, it was a really cool concept; what&#8217;s to hide?  Free East London.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/08/12/point-of-view-by-office-for-subversive-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-165907</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 00:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/2008/08/12/point-of-view-by-office-for-subversive-architecture/#comment-165907</guid>
		<description>Pretty funny, but I would have liked to have seen pictures of the view itself.  I&#039;m just as curious as they were!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty funny, but I would have liked to have seen pictures of the view itself.  I&#8217;m just as curious as they were!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edward</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/08/12/point-of-view-by-office-for-subversive-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-165885</link>
		<dc:creator>edward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 23:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/2008/08/12/point-of-view-by-office-for-subversive-architecture/#comment-165885</guid>
		<description>No railings? Copied from N_____. Not good enough for dezeen.  Passe. Too much BS explanation. Come on guys, pile on!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No railings? Copied from N_____. Not good enough for dezeen.  Passe. Too much BS explanation. Come on guys, pile on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TOMO</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/08/12/point-of-view-by-office-for-subversive-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-165867</link>
		<dc:creator>TOMO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 21:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/2008/08/12/point-of-view-by-office-for-subversive-architecture/#comment-165867</guid>
		<description>couldnt be more refreshing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>couldnt be more refreshing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nils</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/08/12/point-of-view-by-office-for-subversive-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-165770</link>
		<dc:creator>nils</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/2008/08/12/point-of-view-by-office-for-subversive-architecture/#comment-165770</guid>
		<description>i love it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i love it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: COXI</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/08/12/point-of-view-by-office-for-subversive-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-165745</link>
		<dc:creator>COXI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/2008/08/12/point-of-view-by-office-for-subversive-architecture/#comment-165745</guid>
		<description>This is the most interesting work OSA have done since INTACT (way back in 2004-2006.) 

I always expect to see them do some sort of slick bar, they have done so many of them, so this project is refreshingly subtle! 

I have two ongoing concerns with OSA: 

1. It is clear they work with (take?) other people&#039;s ideas and then claim credit for them. 
-  They have mastered the architecture and design PR machine! 

2. Their name is absurd 
-   These are just more euro-rich-kids making pretty things  and splashing some random theory onto it to try to make it more than ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the most interesting work OSA have done since INTACT (way back in 2004-2006.) </p>
<p>I always expect to see them do some sort of slick bar, they have done so many of them, so this project is refreshingly subtle! </p>
<p>I have two ongoing concerns with OSA: </p>
<p>1. It is clear they work with (take?) other people&#8217;s ideas and then claim credit for them.<br />
-  They have mastered the architecture and design PR machine! </p>
<p>2. Their name is absurd<br />
-   These are just more euro-rich-kids making pretty things  and splashing some random theory onto it to try to make it more than &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>