Comments on: Room 68 by Anarchitect

By: Bob

Bob — Sat, 14 Feb 2009 02:11:33 +0000

Cute name, “Anarchitect.” Wishful thinking, though.

By: design to a t

design to a t — Sat, 11 Oct 2008 22:43:52 +0000

my god is this what happens when you dont go to design school. too cluttered and fussy. less is more……….

By: Dr Skruffknuckles

Dr Skruffknuckles — Sun, 07 Sep 2008 14:38:51 +0000

Yes Iam an architect an I think this is not very good, Zaha would of done a better job a few years back.

By: ashton

ashton — Sat, 06 Sep 2008 03:01:39 +0000

i cant believe all the critics are talking about how “dated” the design looks, whereas, that was the whole point of the architect! site context, cultural context! are u guys really designers / architects ?

By: ashton

ashton — Sat, 06 Sep 2008 02:59:05 +0000

well, there are people who can appreciate genius, and there are those who cant. this restaurant is good. i rest my case

By: tiffany

tiffany — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 20:46:55 +0000

How can you make an Elton John interior if you call yourself Anarchitect?

By: Billy

Billy — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 11:03:59 +0000

Lamps- should have gone for Dixon Mirrorballs instead

By: Fbot

Fbot — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 02:47:54 +0000

Those pendants were a bad choice here

By: Tyler Durden

Tyler Durden — Mon, 01 Sep 2008 19:24:53 +0000

leopoldo: you don’t need to be a good architect to be a good critic. Which also read – you don’t need to post work here to critic here. Most architectural critics are not architects.

At the end of the day, crap is crap. Can’t see what’s good about this piece of work, ‘taste’ aside. Honestly!

By: leopoldo

leopoldo — Mon, 01 Sep 2008 17:12:30 +0000

Good work.