Comments on: Soft Hercules by FAT

By: reality check

reality check — Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:16:44 +0000

the legs are lame. otherwise it’s kinda cool.

By: capucine

capucine — Tue, 07 Oct 2008 09:37:19 +0000

it’s perfectly too much, i like it.

By: scruces

scruces — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 04:38:43 +0000

super sweet, and it ends

By: Rive

Rive — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 09:27:37 +0000

talking about deconstructivism…

By: niels

niels — Sun, 28 Sep 2008 19:37:47 +0000

probably not the most sophisticated but still using something as sacred as a face as a plane to sit on, you got to love the way the piece works! awesome

By: xtiaan

xtiaan — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 13:36:26 +0000

SO GOOD!

as for thibauts “urban attention getters” comment, WTF?!!!

what would you call putting up a new building, which is what most of the posts at dezeen are concerned with?

its the absolute ultimate in urban attention seeking

yet because a building is not a humourous offhand gesture, as you could interpret this stool, and architecture has the same kind of cred behind it that ‘fine art” or ‘philosophy” or any other university department has, its somehow more acceptable to your delicate sensibilities.
Get a decent haircut and a sense of humour, or as this is a post about stools

sit on it.

By: Thibaut

Thibaut — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 12:11:28 +0000

We may have hit the bottom with this one. Had its place on collegehumor.com, probably not here. If so, we might as well use a new name for designers : urban attention getters.

By: charles

charles — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 03:38:34 +0000

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA,
omg wtf?

AHAHA, this is great that its so stupid.
I gotta show this to everyone.

By: PPatrício

PPatrício — Thu, 25 Sep 2008 18:13:57 +0000

The best piece of design so fart.

By: Maya Nasution

Maya Nasution — Thu, 25 Sep 2008 15:09:07 +0000

this is non-sense design. cant imagine any comfort & purpose of it…only pain in the *.ss*