Comments on: Conesa 4560 by Adamo-Faiden

By: Danny

Danny — Tue, 18 Nov 2008 01:16:09 +0000

Architect makes no attempt to enliven or address the street at ground floor. i like the aesthtic but feel it needs alot more planting to take the edge off this high minimalism.

By: antonius

antonius — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 10:43:43 +0000

This is a typical ‘design’ solution. No more no less. Very rectangular and very ‘modern’. So thats how we architects think. But…….didn’t we learn anything from f.e. Robert venturi? We are the experts! Maybe we should read Roberts Musil ‘man ohne eigenschaften’ and take our expertise not to serious. What about comfort, ambiguity? I think it is actually pretty boring.

By: Palscan

Palscan — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:11:28 +0000

All well and good till a child falls through the hand rail and bumps its head on those oh so hard looking stairs. not very utilitas if you ask me. I don’t work for the HSE but we should be responsible as well as creative, in fact good architecture is never a zero sum game, so there’s no such things as sacrificing creativity for responsible design, anyone who tells you that are talking rubbish and should quit the profession.

By: K. Rimane

K. Rimane — Wed, 12 Nov 2008 02:28:16 +0000

c’est superbe!

By: iamreply

iamreply — Tue, 11 Nov 2008 23:57:11 +0000

This is very well balanced. nice proportions. confident. well done guys.