<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wank by Craig Alun Smith</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dezeen.com/2008/11/27/wank-by-craig-alun-smith/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/11/27/wank-by-craig-alun-smith/</link>
	<description>architecture and design magazine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:41:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luxury Larry</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/11/27/wank-by-craig-alun-smith/comment-page-1/#comment-223627</link>
		<dc:creator>Luxury Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/2008/11/27/wank-by-craig-alun-smith/#comment-223627</guid>
		<description>And does Wallpaper has a voice anymore? I find them barely scrap the surface. I think they need to spend more time on themselves then going around reviewing new talent!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And does Wallpaper has a voice anymore? I find them barely scrap the surface. I think they need to spend more time on themselves then going around reviewing new talent!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luxury Larry</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/11/27/wank-by-craig-alun-smith/comment-page-1/#comment-223625</link>
		<dc:creator>Luxury Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 16:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/2008/11/27/wank-by-craig-alun-smith/#comment-223625</guid>
		<description>What pretentious crap. Even the explnation fails to lift my enthusiasm for this. And why the name WANK? PR sake!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What pretentious crap. Even the explnation fails to lift my enthusiasm for this. And why the name WANK? PR sake!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mantas</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/11/27/wank-by-craig-alun-smith/comment-page-1/#comment-214486</link>
		<dc:creator>mantas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 18:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/2008/11/27/wank-by-craig-alun-smith/#comment-214486</guid>
		<description>my work about the same problem. But aestetics of this &quot;wank&quot; i don&#039;t like.
http://www.lesauskas.lt/Daiktai.html?subGalID=27</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my work about the same problem. But aestetics of this &#8220;wank&#8221; i don&#8217;t like.<br />
<a href="http://www.lesauskas.lt/Daiktai.html?subGalID=27" rel="nofollow">http://www.lesauskas.lt/Daiktai.html?subGalID=27</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iamreply</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/11/27/wank-by-craig-alun-smith/comment-page-1/#comment-212579</link>
		<dc:creator>iamreply</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 01:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/2008/11/27/wank-by-craig-alun-smith/#comment-212579</guid>
		<description>By adding to the problem and then offering a name in the way of a disclaimer it just makes you look like a wanker</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By adding to the problem and then offering a name in the way of a disclaimer it just makes you look like a wanker</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arjan Scheer</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2008/11/27/wank-by-craig-alun-smith/comment-page-1/#comment-211596</link>
		<dc:creator>Arjan Scheer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 10:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/2008/11/27/wank-by-craig-alun-smith/#comment-211596</guid>
		<description>Yes, as a designer this may look enticing...: Hey, designers can be like photojournalists: although you are fueling the want of the buyer, yet you talk about &#039;real&#039; issues... But, &#039;a word is not a block of concrete&#039; as Tschumi said, and the interpretation is in the eye of the beholder... Maybe, let writers do what writers do, and designers do what designers do best?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, as a designer this may look enticing&#8230;: Hey, designers can be like photojournalists: although you are fueling the want of the buyer, yet you talk about &#8216;real&#8217; issues&#8230; But, &#8216;a word is not a block of concrete&#8217; as Tschumi said, and the interpretation is in the eye of the beholder&#8230; Maybe, let writers do what writers do, and designers do what designers do best?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
