<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anything by Michael Sodeau and Suikosha</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dezeen.com/2009/01/07/anything-stationary-by-michael-sodeau/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2009/01/07/anything-stationary-by-michael-sodeau/</link>
	<description>architecture and design magazine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:21:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: andie</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2009/01/07/anything-stationary-by-michael-sodeau/comment-page-1/#comment-520632</link>
		<dc:creator>andie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2010 01:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/2009/01/07/anything-stationary-by-michael-sodeau/#comment-520632</guid>
		<description>Just because we could not accomplish (design) something physically, it does not mean we surrender the right and responsibility to critically comment on the design. For example, a fashion magazine editor does not design or sew any of those garments, but he or she has the right to critique the design in terms of silhouette, fabrication, details and etc. So in your words, no body should judge whether the Mac computer is good or not because we all failed to make it? Then what is a good design? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because we could not accomplish (design) something physically, it does not mean we surrender the right and responsibility to critically comment on the design. For example, a fashion magazine editor does not design or sew any of those garments, but he or she has the right to critique the design in terms of silhouette, fabrication, details and etc. So in your words, no body should judge whether the Mac computer is good or not because we all failed to make it? Then what is a good design?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joaquin</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2009/01/07/anything-stationary-by-michael-sodeau/comment-page-1/#comment-230183</link>
		<dc:creator>Joaquin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/2009/01/07/anything-stationary-by-michael-sodeau/#comment-230183</guid>
		<description>It turns out Zuy is actually Starck in real world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It turns out Zuy is actually Starck in real world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2009/01/07/anything-stationary-by-michael-sodeau/comment-page-1/#comment-229557</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 14:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/2009/01/07/anything-stationary-by-michael-sodeau/#comment-229557</guid>
		<description>dUDES,
dON&#039;T BE FEEDING OFF NEGATIVITY, NOW...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dUDES,<br />
dON&#8217;T BE FEEDING OFF NEGATIVITY, NOW&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cam</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2009/01/07/anything-stationary-by-michael-sodeau/comment-page-1/#comment-225114</link>
		<dc:creator>Cam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/2009/01/07/anything-stationary-by-michael-sodeau/#comment-225114</guid>
		<description>How hilarious.  Zuy is either really ignorant... or insane.

&quot;No Modular you could’nt have designed Starck’s juice squeezer…. nobody could do that&quot;
...well actually, Starck did design it, and I assure you he IS somebody.

I would also love to see some of your design work Zuy.  Come on... link us!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How hilarious.  Zuy is either really ignorant&#8230; or insane.</p>
<p>&#8220;No Modular you could’nt have designed Starck’s juice squeezer…. nobody could do that&#8221;<br />
&#8230;well actually, Starck did design it, and I assure you he IS somebody.</p>
<p>I would also love to see some of your design work Zuy.  Come on&#8230; link us!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oscar</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2009/01/07/anything-stationary-by-michael-sodeau/comment-page-1/#comment-224633</link>
		<dc:creator>oscar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/2009/01/07/anything-stationary-by-michael-sodeau/#comment-224633</guid>
		<description>To AL:
The extruded asterisk is a rubber. Its shape allows you to always have a nice corner of rubber to erase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To AL:<br />
The extruded asterisk is a rubber. Its shape allows you to always have a nice corner of rubber to erase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
