<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Farewell Chapel by OFIS Arhitekti</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dezeen.com/2009/06/17/farewell-chapel-by-ofis-architekti/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2009/06/17/farewell-chapel-by-ofis-architekti/</link>
	<description>architecture and design magazine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:21:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: epi</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2009/06/17/farewell-chapel-by-ofis-architekti/comment-page-1/#comment-284289</link>
		<dc:creator>epi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/2009/06/17/farewell-chapel-by-ofis-architekti/#comment-284289</guid>
		<description>wow! elegant! but I miss pics of the interior - also on the ofis homepage!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow! elegant! but I miss pics of the interior &#8211; also on the ofis homepage!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: max habib</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2009/06/17/farewell-chapel-by-ofis-architekti/comment-page-1/#comment-283795</link>
		<dc:creator>max habib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 05:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/2009/06/17/farewell-chapel-by-ofis-architekti/#comment-283795</guid>
		<description>gorgeous</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gorgeous</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: overdose</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2009/06/17/farewell-chapel-by-ofis-architekti/comment-page-1/#comment-283110</link>
		<dc:creator>overdose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 07:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/2009/06/17/farewell-chapel-by-ofis-architekti/#comment-283110</guid>
		<description>A cross sign to this chapel is like a Mercedes sign to a car. Works for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A cross sign to this chapel is like a Mercedes sign to a car. Works for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goodfeeling</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2009/06/17/farewell-chapel-by-ofis-architekti/comment-page-1/#comment-282972</link>
		<dc:creator>goodfeeling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/2009/06/17/farewell-chapel-by-ofis-architekti/#comment-282972</guid>
		<description>Beautiful work, but I also think it would be much prettier without the cross. Its a chapel, not a church. If someone uses chapel it doesn&#039;t mean that he/she is a catholic or any other believer.
Chapels should be without religious symbols, which should be placed on graves.
Multi-religious graveyards with non-symbolized chapels are cool :)
We are in 21st century!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beautiful work, but I also think it would be much prettier without the cross. Its a chapel, not a church. If someone uses chapel it doesn&#8217;t mean that he/she is a catholic or any other believer.<br />
Chapels should be without religious symbols, which should be placed on graves.<br />
Multi-religious graveyards with non-symbolized chapels are cool :)<br />
We are in 21st century!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: windbag</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2009/06/17/farewell-chapel-by-ofis-architekti/comment-page-1/#comment-282970</link>
		<dc:creator>windbag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/2009/06/17/farewell-chapel-by-ofis-architekti/#comment-282970</guid>
		<description>@chapmaniac.

what&#039;s wrong with that?
first, the intention was to build a chapel, so a building that is supposed to inspire some sense of spirituality and contemplation.
I don&#039;t see much spirituality in an underground car park, that&#039;s all.
Check picture number 6, that railing is really cheap.
I think the intentions were good, the reference to Ronchamp and all, I don&#039;t mind the cross, Tadao Ando did the same thing, literal but that&#039;s fine.
All considered anyway I think the overall result is quite poor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@chapmaniac.</p>
<p>what&#8217;s wrong with that?<br />
first, the intention was to build a chapel, so a building that is supposed to inspire some sense of spirituality and contemplation.<br />
I don&#8217;t see much spirituality in an underground car park, that&#8217;s all.<br />
Check picture number 6, that railing is really cheap.<br />
I think the intentions were good, the reference to Ronchamp and all, I don&#8217;t mind the cross, Tadao Ando did the same thing, literal but that&#8217;s fine.<br />
All considered anyway I think the overall result is quite poor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
