<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hutong Bubble 32 by MAD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dezeen.com/2009/09/14/hutong-bubble-32-by-mad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2009/09/14/hutong-bubble-32-by-mad/</link>
	<description>architecture and design magazine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:32:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aay</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2009/09/14/hutong-bubble-32-by-mad/comment-page-1/#comment-935313</link>
		<dc:creator>Aay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 02:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/?p=38336#comment-935313</guid>
		<description>An ideal grafted space. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An ideal grafted space. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heritage preserver</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2009/09/14/hutong-bubble-32-by-mad/comment-page-1/#comment-752023</link>
		<dc:creator>Heritage preserver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 07:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/?p=38336#comment-752023</guid>
		<description>TOTALLY agree with Amanda Smith. Modernisation is fit for younger countries like in the west, where their history only lasts a few hundred years. For China, which has a written history of over 5000 years (and an unwritten one of over 12000 according to archeological evidence), it would be detrimental, because the unique pieces of history would be gone for ever. The Hutong bubble is not helping us preserve anything, rather, if it is going to be built as a permanent solution, it will quickly demolish the hutongs. Its shape isn&#039;t even efficient! Like R said, a piece of antique is worth nothing if you purposely add something new to it. Its like polishing the blade of 5000 year old sword and sanding and then laqcuering its handle, making it look no different to a modern shiny replica. 
Hands off, Western world. You&#039;ve done enough damage to China already. First you smash and rob the ancient imperial garden, then you promote tobacco to China&#039;s young generation when its outlawed in your own country, and now you are trying to make extinct China&#039;s remaining heritage?! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TOTALLY agree with Amanda Smith. Modernisation is fit for younger countries like in the west, where their history only lasts a few hundred years. For China, which has a written history of over 5000 years (and an unwritten one of over 12000 according to archeological evidence), it would be detrimental, because the unique pieces of history would be gone for ever. The Hutong bubble is not helping us preserve anything, rather, if it is going to be built as a permanent solution, it will quickly demolish the hutongs. Its shape isn&#039;t even efficient! Like R said, a piece of antique is worth nothing if you purposely add something new to it. Its like polishing the blade of 5000 year old sword and sanding and then laqcuering its handle, making it look no different to a modern shiny replica.<br />
Hands off, Western world. You&#039;ve done enough damage to China already. First you smash and rob the ancient imperial garden, then you promote tobacco to China&#039;s young generation when its outlawed in your own country, and now you are trying to make extinct China&#039;s remaining heritage?! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lemon</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2009/09/14/hutong-bubble-32-by-mad/comment-page-1/#comment-526154</link>
		<dc:creator>lemon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 15:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/?p=38336#comment-526154</guid>
		<description>i don&#039;t know whether it fit for beijing traditional hutongs ,but it&#039;s funny 
maybe  its mordern with traditon </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don&#8217;t know whether it fit for beijing traditional hutongs ,but it&#8217;s funny</p>
<p>maybe  its mordern with traditon </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DMV</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2009/09/14/hutong-bubble-32-by-mad/comment-page-1/#comment-475535</link>
		<dc:creator>DMV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 02:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/?p=38336#comment-475535</guid>
		<description>just beautiful</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just beautiful</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jakob</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2009/09/14/hutong-bubble-32-by-mad/comment-page-1/#comment-344168</link>
		<dc:creator>jakob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/?p=38336#comment-344168</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m in beijing right now and would love to see the bubble in person. does anyone know the exact address? will happily answer questions about materiality etc. after my visit. so please please, the address (in chinese characters is fine), thank you thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m in beijing right now and would love to see the bubble in person. does anyone know the exact address? will happily answer questions about materiality etc. after my visit. so please please, the address (in chinese characters is fine), thank you thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 7/15 queries in 0.012 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 314/318 objects using memcached

Served from: www.dezeen.com @ 2013-06-19 09:25:32 -->