<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Form 2 by Fuseproject</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dezeen.com/2009/11/03/form-2-by-fuseproject/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2009/11/03/form-2-by-fuseproject/</link>
	<description>architecture and design magazine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:32:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cleondann</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2009/11/03/form-2-by-fuseproject/comment-page-1/#comment-351507</link>
		<dc:creator>cleondann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 11:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/?p=48743#comment-351507</guid>
		<description>Nice structure... wht kind of sex toy is this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice structure&#8230; wht kind of sex toy is this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2009/11/03/form-2-by-fuseproject/comment-page-1/#comment-341138</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 05:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/?p=48743#comment-341138</guid>
		<description>I love the idea of on/off switch as &#039;clitoris&#039;.  Actually, there are two clitoris-es.  (Clitori?   What is the proper word ... or is there one?  Has anyone ever even considered the possibility of more than one clitoris [until now])?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the idea of on/off switch as &#8216;clitoris&#8217;.  Actually, there are two clitoris-es.  (Clitori?   What is the proper word &#8230; or is there one?  Has anyone ever even considered the possibility of more than one clitoris [until now])?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yrag</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2009/11/03/form-2-by-fuseproject/comment-page-1/#comment-340964</link>
		<dc:creator>yrag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 07:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/?p=48743#comment-340964</guid>
		<description>I have to admit I AM curious about FUNCTION!

To be blunt, is this meant to be a two orifice device for women? A mechanical &#039;shocker&#039; if you will? 

Oh yeah, and Barton Smith— it&#039;s, a, beautiful, design . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to admit I AM curious about FUNCTION!</p>
<p>To be blunt, is this meant to be a two orifice device for women? A mechanical &#8217;shocker&#8217; if you will? </p>
<p>Oh yeah, and Barton Smith— it&#8217;s, a, beautiful, design . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2009/11/03/form-2-by-fuseproject/comment-page-1/#comment-339489</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/?p=48743#comment-339489</guid>
		<description>You have to concur that the insighteful commentaries would have been far more likely to have been forthcoming if the descriptive brief accompanying the beautiful imagery was a little less coy and peculiarly euphemistic, the design is straightforward enough and aesthetically interesting but surely the fact that it&#039;s design is being scrutinized should warrant a far more pragmatic description of what the object actually achieves or aims to achieve?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have to concur that the insighteful commentaries would have been far more likely to have been forthcoming if the descriptive brief accompanying the beautiful imagery was a little less coy and peculiarly euphemistic, the design is straightforward enough and aesthetically interesting but surely the fact that it&#8217;s design is being scrutinized should warrant a far more pragmatic description of what the object actually achieves or aims to achieve?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prof. Z.</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2009/11/03/form-2-by-fuseproject/comment-page-1/#comment-336810</link>
		<dc:creator>Prof. Z.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 13:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/?p=48743#comment-336810</guid>
		<description>ERRATA: 
i&#039;m sorry Yves , your form is innovative , i dunnot  read the text and i&#039;m not a specialist of this tools as i&#039;m italian +french... 
The only problem is  battery(why you do not use the  OLPC system to produce electricity with a cord? )..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ERRATA:<br />
i&#8217;m sorry Yves , your form is innovative , i dunnot  read the text and i&#8217;m not a specialist of this tools as i&#8217;m italian +french&#8230;<br />
The only problem is  battery(why you do not use the  OLPC system to produce electricity with a cord? )..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prof. Z.</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2009/11/03/form-2-by-fuseproject/comment-page-1/#comment-336586</link>
		<dc:creator>Prof. Z.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/?p=48743#comment-336586</guid>
		<description>some more interesting photos there about&quot; love in stereo&quot; is a better name than form2 and for a better storytelling...
http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/alissa-walker/designerati/new-vibrator-yves-behar-arouses-our-interest</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>some more interesting photos there about&#8221; love in stereo&#8221; is a better name than form2 and for a better storytelling&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/alissa-walker/designerati/new-vibrator-yves-behar-arouses-our-interest" rel="nofollow">http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/alissa-walker/designerati/new-vibrator-yves-behar-arouses-our-interest</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaykay</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2009/11/03/form-2-by-fuseproject/comment-page-1/#comment-336516</link>
		<dc:creator>jaykay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/?p=48743#comment-336516</guid>
		<description>I must admit that i intend to acknowledge Professor Z. with applause.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must admit that i intend to acknowledge Professor Z. with applause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prof. Z.</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2009/11/03/form-2-by-fuseproject/comment-page-1/#comment-336445</link>
		<dc:creator>Prof. Z.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 08:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/?p=48743#comment-336445</guid>
		<description>I &#039;m OK with Chuck Anziulewicz   and Vivian , the use of   a product is important and I must say to Barton Smith beautiful is not  design ....it&#039;s only form . With no innovation design is a dead end, it&#039;s only one more thing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I &#8216;m OK with Chuck Anziulewicz   and Vivian , the use of   a product is important and I must say to Barton Smith beautiful is not  design &#8230;.it&#8217;s only form . With no innovation design is a dead end, it&#8217;s only one more thing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barton Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2009/11/03/form-2-by-fuseproject/comment-page-1/#comment-336420</link>
		<dc:creator>Barton Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 04:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/?p=48743#comment-336420</guid>
		<description>I thought dezeen readers would have had more insightful comments, like how beautiful the design is...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought dezeen readers would have had more insightful comments, like how beautiful the design is&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vivian</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2009/11/03/form-2-by-fuseproject/comment-page-1/#comment-336237</link>
		<dc:creator>Vivian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 20:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/?p=48743#comment-336237</guid>
		<description>How does it work?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does it work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>