<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Built to Wear by Ball-Nogues Studio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dezeen.com/2009/12/18/built-to-wear-by-ball-nogues-studio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2009/12/18/built-to-wear-by-ball-nogues-studio/</link>
	<description>architecture and design magazine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:21:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2009/12/18/built-to-wear-by-ball-nogues-studio/comment-page-1/#comment-876901</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 05:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/?p=57351#comment-876901</guid>
		<description>Architecture or not, I think it&#039;s done beautifully. It might be fun to look with hypercolor shirts too. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Architecture or not, I think it&#039;s done beautifully. It might be fun to look with hypercolor shirts too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2009/12/18/built-to-wear-by-ball-nogues-studio/comment-page-1/#comment-460412</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 19:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/?p=57351#comment-460412</guid>
		<description>A chandelier made from t-shirts and hot pants is much better than, say, a large CNC-milled subdivision surface that would be burned after the exhibition.

fresh and clever (as intended).

(saying that this lies outside of architectural discourse is reactionary and ridiculous.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A chandelier made from t-shirts and hot pants is much better than, say, a large CNC-milled subdivision surface that would be burned after the exhibition.</p>
<p>fresh and clever (as intended).</p>
<p>(saying that this lies outside of architectural discourse is reactionary and ridiculous.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cb</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2009/12/18/built-to-wear-by-ball-nogues-studio/comment-page-1/#comment-444434</link>
		<dc:creator>cb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 16:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/?p=57351#comment-444434</guid>
		<description>i agree with architgirl, it is not really architecture.  architecture may not be defined as purley functional shelter, but not enough about the above to me says architecture other than the creators of it who associate with architecture.  i think it is sculpture.  it is form making, color, composition and yes it is spatial, like architecture also is, but so can sculpture be.  anyhow, i like it much better for its color and texture than its spatial or tectonic qualities...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree with architgirl, it is not really architecture.  architecture may not be defined as purley functional shelter, but not enough about the above to me says architecture other than the creators of it who associate with architecture.  i think it is sculpture.  it is form making, color, composition and yes it is spatial, like architecture also is, but so can sculpture be.  anyhow, i like it much better for its color and texture than its spatial or tectonic qualities&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2009/12/18/built-to-wear-by-ball-nogues-studio/comment-page-1/#comment-353880</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 16:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/?p=57351#comment-353880</guid>
		<description>@architectgal 

How is this not architecture? I am just curious as to why you think this. Is this your definition of architecture?

&quot;enclosed structure to serve a useful purpose by its construction&quot;

Very curious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@architectgal </p>
<p>How is this not architecture? I am just curious as to why you think this. Is this your definition of architecture?</p>
<p>&#8220;enclosed structure to serve a useful purpose by its construction&#8221;</p>
<p>Very curious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: juan german guardati</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2009/12/18/built-to-wear-by-ball-nogues-studio/comment-page-1/#comment-353731</link>
		<dc:creator>juan german guardati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 19:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/?p=57351#comment-353731</guid>
		<description>brillant idea!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>brillant idea!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
