Comments on: Energy Roof Perugia by Coop Himmelb(l)au

By: WestminJames

WestminJames — Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:13:43 +0000

architecture can be seen as two sides of a coin. on one we have the modern outlook pushing forward, challenging new designs because what is the point of design if we dont try something new and evolve? however on the flip side there is the aspect that we should still try and preserve our history and restore and conserve. the deisgn isnt too bad but is this really the best place they could have thought of putting this? seriously, im all of the old and new being brought together but this design is frankly a monstrosity. i dont doubt it would have become ”recognizable” but an icon for the city, please, the Italians know far better than to approve this.

By: YUK!!!

YUK!!! — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:01:03 +0000

My Username says it all !!! What’s the point of building something so expensive in a town center left in the hands of pushers and junkies…I think Perugia has already spent enough on the minimetro-flop!!!

By: Yunus Emre Kara

Yunus Emre Kara — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:57:06 +0000

fraktal geometry… ehh… why not? but turbine, why? it’s not only making noise but also producing little kW(?). Is the speed and the force of the wind between two building enough? i don,t think so.

By: bakku

bakku — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 04:33:22 +0000

Fun with lofting surfaces in rhino! The renderings are provocative, however this one should have been kept as a unfortunate 3D modeling study. With empathy the community and the community of architecture, I beg that this proposal be kept a study.

By: hernindya

hernindya — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 03:47:36 +0000

it will ruin the city harmony.
energy ? i dont get it?
an egocentric trash