Comments on: Face to Face by Ministry of Design http://www.dezeen.com/2010/01/22/face-to-face-by-ministry-of-design/ architecture and design magazine Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:21:52 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: JT http://www.dezeen.com/2010/01/22/face-to-face-by-ministry-of-design/comment-page-1/#comment-745421 JT Tue, 19 Apr 2011 04:22:03 +0000 http://www.dezeen.com/?p=61366#comment-745421 Which company owns this office ? Which company owns this office ?

]]> By: jour park http://www.dezeen.com/2010/01/22/face-to-face-by-ministry-of-design/comment-page-1/#comment-373373 jour park Thu, 11 Feb 2010 01:44:06 +0000 http://www.dezeen.com/?p=61366#comment-373373 lighting good~ lighting good~

]]> By: Jonathan Price http://www.dezeen.com/2010/01/22/face-to-face-by-ministry-of-design/comment-page-1/#comment-363177 Jonathan Price Sat, 23 Jan 2010 18:02:43 +0000 http://www.dezeen.com/?p=61366#comment-363177 This is a quite exceptional level of design for a serviced office. I look forward to visiting it. This is a quite exceptional level of design for a serviced office. I look forward to visiting it.

]]> By: btplmr http://www.dezeen.com/2010/01/22/face-to-face-by-ministry-of-design/comment-page-1/#comment-363067 btplmr Sat, 23 Jan 2010 13:20:02 +0000 http://www.dezeen.com/?p=61366#comment-363067 first 3 photos look like an adidas showroom. the rest is quite nice. i am not a big fan of black and white first 3 photos look like an adidas showroom. the rest is quite nice. i am not a big fan of black and white

]]> By: Leandro Llorente http://www.dezeen.com/2010/01/22/face-to-face-by-ministry-of-design/comment-page-1/#comment-362968 Leandro Llorente Sat, 23 Jan 2010 02:05:42 +0000 http://www.dezeen.com/?p=61366#comment-362968 id love knowing that the tree bark at the bottom part of glacade has structural integrity, otherwise the act of doodling on the facade just has a pictorial intent but offers no 'deep' realization of building as a 'structure' id like to see the doodle changed how the spaces are configured and how the architectural/spatial body counter-acts or reacts to this doodle... never a doodle as an ornamentation. id like to see the 'form'al boundaries of the spiral stair conversing with the rounded-edge square atrium... like the gesture of moving in a spiral gesture (connotes circular in form) but in a rounded-edge square form the SS overhead lighting (funnel shaped) on top of eames aluminum looks good but mechanical diffuser (square) should be tucked on a cove or expressed as a form also id love knowing that the tree bark at the bottom part of glacade has structural integrity, otherwise the act of doodling
on the facade just has a pictorial intent but offers no ‘deep’ realization of building as a ‘structure’

id like to see the doodle changed how the spaces are configured and how the architectural/spatial body counter-acts or
reacts to this doodle… never a doodle as an ornamentation.

id like to see the ‘form’al boundaries of the spiral stair conversing with the rounded-edge square atrium…
like the gesture of moving in a spiral gesture (connotes circular in form) but in a rounded-edge square form

the SS overhead lighting (funnel shaped) on top of eames aluminum looks good but mechanical diffuser (square) should be tucked
on a cove or expressed as a form also

]]>