http://www.dezeen.com/2011/02/17/holding-pattern-by-interboro-partners/ architecture and design magazine Wed, 22 May 2013 15:23:20 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1 http://www.dezeen.com/2011/02/17/holding-pattern-by-interboro-partners/comment-page-1/#comment-708375 JuiceMajor Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:39:30 +0000 http://www.dezeen.com/?p=117110#comment-708375 I luv it...a bit Clatrava but still nice. I luv it…a bit Clatrava but still nice.

]]> http://www.dezeen.com/2011/02/17/holding-pattern-by-interboro-partners/comment-page-1/#comment-703181 jake Fri, 18 Feb 2011 21:18:41 +0000 http://www.dezeen.com/?p=117110#comment-703181 The installation in the link seems to be a much more well designed installation. The installation in the link seems to be a much more well designed installation.

]]> http://www.dezeen.com/2011/02/17/holding-pattern-by-interboro-partners/comment-page-1/#comment-703010 dikkie smabers Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:10:25 +0000 http://www.dezeen.com/?p=117110#comment-703010 Typical contemporary architecture: more words than images. If you want to say something you should have became a writer, not an architect... Typical contemporary architecture: more words than images.
If you want to say something you should have became a writer, not an architect…

]]> http://www.dezeen.com/2011/02/17/holding-pattern-by-interboro-partners/comment-page-1/#comment-702940 Daniela Fri, 18 Feb 2011 14:52:19 +0000 http://www.dezeen.com/?p=117110#comment-702940 I love the swirvy-ness. I agree that it would be nice to do more with space, but it's doing a lot with shading and visual texture. It's great to see this competition still going strong. I love the swirvy-ness. I agree that it would be nice to do more with space, but it's doing a lot with shading and visual texture. It's great to see this competition still going strong.

]]> http://www.dezeen.com/2011/02/17/holding-pattern-by-interboro-partners/comment-page-1/#comment-702778 san Thu, 17 Feb 2011 19:31:28 +0000 http://www.dezeen.com/?p=117110#comment-702778 I could not agree more! I miss the time when the moma ps1 was a stage for architectural innovation and a testfield for new ideas....not only was this kind of structure done hundreds of times before (grasshopper anyone...?) but even more importantly it does not really create spatial qualities - instead it is a structure hovering above the concrete walls. if at least those beams would touch the ground of the courtyards, they would create different zones and could offer seating and such I could not agree more! I miss the time when the moma ps1 was a stage for architectural innovation and a testfield for new ideas….not only was this kind of structure done hundreds of times before (grasshopper anyone…?) but even more importantly it does not really create spatial qualities – instead it is a structure hovering above the concrete walls. if at least those beams would touch the ground of the courtyards, they would create different zones and could offer seating and such

]]>