<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scenario by MCZ</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dezeen.com/2011/09/12/scenario-by-mcz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2011/09/12/scenario-by-mcz/</link>
	<description>architecture and design magazine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 15:23:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2011/09/12/scenario-by-mcz/comment-page-1/#comment-904833</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/?p=153713#comment-904833</guid>
		<description>iFire </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>iFire </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edward</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2011/09/12/scenario-by-mcz/comment-page-1/#comment-858578</link>
		<dc:creator>edward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/?p=153713#comment-858578</guid>
		<description>A much more practical solution is 2 TVs with one showing a real fire burning merrily along that can be turned off if detracting. Not having a fireplace, I really appreciated the channel that showed a log fire without interruption at Christmas time. Now no longer available sad to say.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A much more practical solution is 2 TVs with one showing a real fire burning merrily along that can be turned off if detracting. Not having a fireplace, I really appreciated the channel that showed a log fire without interruption at Christmas time. Now no longer available sad to say.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Honsa</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2011/09/12/scenario-by-mcz/comment-page-1/#comment-858506</link>
		<dc:creator>Honsa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/?p=153713#comment-858506</guid>
		<description>I hope they also have wallpapers with logs for this... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope they also have wallpapers with logs for this&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: felix</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2011/09/12/scenario-by-mcz/comment-page-1/#comment-858271</link>
		<dc:creator>felix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 23:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/?p=153713#comment-858271</guid>
		<description>The light from the fire will distract from the television, so you can&#039;t use both at the same time, which kind of makes it seem conceptually ugly to put two mutually exclusive objects together, 
 
Also don&#039;t like that it&#039;ll force you to change your fireplace when you upgrade your television. 
 
I understand that there is an existing problem where many living rooms have their focus as the television now, or the uncomfortable battle between two focal points when you have a tv and fire. But this is not the way to solve it. 
 
I don&#039;t really see how the idea couldn&#039;t be improved by simply selling both as separate but matching products. More freedom to position them would be a big benefit to this approach. But it wouldn&#039;t be &#039;revolutionary&#039; and on design blogs. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The light from the fire will distract from the television, so you can&#039;t use both at the same time, which kind of makes it seem conceptually ugly to put two mutually exclusive objects together, </p>
<p>Also don&#039;t like that it&#039;ll force you to change your fireplace when you upgrade your television. </p>
<p>I understand that there is an existing problem where many living rooms have their focus as the television now, or the uncomfortable battle between two focal points when you have a tv and fire. But this is not the way to solve it. </p>
<p>I don&#039;t really see how the idea couldn&#039;t be improved by simply selling both as separate but matching products. More freedom to position them would be a big benefit to this approach. But it wouldn&#039;t be &#039;revolutionary&#039; and on design blogs. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kle</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2011/09/12/scenario-by-mcz/comment-page-1/#comment-858207</link>
		<dc:creator>kle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 20:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dezeen.com/?p=153713#comment-858207</guid>
		<description>it looks very clean and nice, but it is so Apple! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it looks very clean and nice, but it is so Apple! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 7/14 queries in 0.009 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 316/316 objects using memcached

Served from: www.dezeen.com @ 2013-05-23 05:42:36 -->