<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hut on Sleds by Crosson Clarke Carnachan Architects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dezeen.com/2012/07/13/hut-on-sleds-by-crosson-clarke-carnachan-architects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2012/07/13/hut-on-sleds-by-crosson-clarke-carnachan-architects/</link>
	<description>architecture and design magazine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 21:59:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: @RyanTee82</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2012/07/13/hut-on-sleds-by-crosson-clarke-carnachan-architects/comment-page-1/#comment-1038046</link>
		<dc:creator>@RyanTee82</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 03:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://admin.dezeen.com/?p=227115#comment-1038046</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s gorgeous, but why is the tractor photoshopped into the picture?  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s gorgeous, but why is the tractor photoshopped into the picture?  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @ArchitectsCCCA</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2012/07/13/hut-on-sleds-by-crosson-clarke-carnachan-architects/comment-page-1/#comment-964388</link>
		<dc:creator>@ArchitectsCCCA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2012 20:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://admin.dezeen.com/?p=227115#comment-964388</guid>
		<description>Too right Mario! However we have since designed the family a custom built table and chairs so I&#039;m afraid there isn&#039;t much eating off knees anymore - CCCA </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too right Mario! However we have since designed the family a custom built table and chairs so I&#039;m afraid there isn&#039;t much eating off knees anymore &#8211; CCCA </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2012/07/13/hut-on-sleds-by-crosson-clarke-carnachan-architects/comment-page-1/#comment-964307</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2012 20:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://admin.dezeen.com/?p=227115#comment-964307</guid>
		<description>Design: A+   
Nice design and the operable enclosure when not in use is clever.    
   
Mobility: D-   
It is hard to believe that this little tractor could drag this load one inch let alone 100s of feet across sand - a material that likes to stymie movement. In the past I was a caretaker for a property and I tried to drag a small one story 8 ft x10 ft wood shed on grass with a tractor larger than this and the tractor almost flipped just before the engine quit. Wood is heavy stuff even with rails. A movie would have been nice to prove your primary claim for this unique design.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Design: A+<br />
Nice design and the operable enclosure when not in use is clever.    </p>
<p>Mobility: D-<br />
It is hard to believe that this little tractor could drag this load one inch let alone 100s of feet across sand &#8211; a material that likes to stymie movement. In the past I was a caretaker for a property and I tried to drag a small one story 8 ft x10 ft wood shed on grass with a tractor larger than this and the tractor almost flipped just before the engine quit. Wood is heavy stuff even with rails. A movie would have been nice to prove your primary claim for this unique design.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jnz</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2012/07/13/hut-on-sleds-by-crosson-clarke-carnachan-architects/comment-page-1/#comment-964299</link>
		<dc:creator>jnz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2012 18:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://admin.dezeen.com/?p=227115#comment-964299</guid>
		<description>The old cottages on the Outer Banks of North Carolina, USA were typically moved from Sound- to Ocean-side and back again with the seasons. A tremendous feat given that trip was about 1/2 mile one way and the houses didn&#039;t have a built-in mobile/sled aesthetic. No indoor plumbing either... but I digress....  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The old cottages on the Outer Banks of North Carolina, USA were typically moved from Sound- to Ocean-side and back again with the seasons. A tremendous feat given that trip was about 1/2 mile one way and the houses didn&#8217;t have a built-in mobile/sled aesthetic. No indoor plumbing either&#8230; but I digress&#8230;.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin.C.Kirby</title>
		<link>http://www.dezeen.com/2012/07/13/hut-on-sleds-by-crosson-clarke-carnachan-architects/comment-page-1/#comment-964000</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin.C.Kirby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 14:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://admin.dezeen.com/?p=227115#comment-964000</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s some wonderful attention to detail going on here, both visually and in terms of functionality. A really very intelligent design, and one making clever use of the local planning requirements. 
 
Personally, and it is a personal thing, but I would&#039;ve liked to have seen more finishes, textures with the interior wood, as a counterbalance to the more rustic, natural, weathered finish of the exterior.  
 
I have to say, I don&#039;t think that the rear is particularly well resolved, lacking the clever design of the main building, and dare I say it, looking rather more Portakabin (though given it&#039;s context, it&#039;s probably rather apt actually), and because of this it feels like the building is lacking an overall coherency. Which is a shame. 
 
That said, it really has that wonderful mid-century modern feel that The Hamptons had, before it was infected by those newly minted 1980&#039;s folk, with lots of money, little taste and a penchant for the ghastly. 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#039;s some wonderful attention to detail going on here, both visually and in terms of functionality. A really very intelligent design, and one making clever use of the local planning requirements. </p>
<p>Personally, and it is a personal thing, but I would&#039;ve liked to have seen more finishes, textures with the interior wood, as a counterbalance to the more rustic, natural, weathered finish of the exterior.  </p>
<p>I have to say, I don&#039;t think that the rear is particularly well resolved, lacking the clever design of the main building, and dare I say it, looking rather more Portakabin (though given it&#039;s context, it&#039;s probably rather apt actually), and because of this it feels like the building is lacking an overall coherency. Which is a shame. </p>
<p>That said, it really has that wonderful mid-century modern feel that The Hamptons had, before it was infected by those newly minted 1980&#039;s folk, with lots of money, little taste and a penchant for the ghastly. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 7/17 queries in 0.010 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 314/322 objects using memcached

Served from: www.dezeen.com @ 2013-05-19 05:44:40 -->