"Frontline soldiers could soon be printing
entire weapons or even aircraft"


"Soon, frontline soldiers could be printing entire weapons or even aircraft"

Following today's news that the first 3D-printed gun has been fired, Dezeen reporter Emilie Chalcraft takes a look at how 3D-printed guns and drones are changing weaponry and warfare in this extract from Print Shift, our one-off publication about 3D printing.

There's a dark side to additive manufacturing. It could transform warfare and put homemade guns in the hands of criminals.

Always quick to find a use for cutting-edge technology, military scientists are deploying 3D printers on the front line to produce everything from gun components to unmanned aircraft. The US Army has been taking the lead, even going so far as to develop its own 3D printer as an alternative to commercial models.

Last July, the first mobile 3D-printing lab arrived in Afghanistan, allowing soldiers to repair their equipment quickly and cheaply, rather than wait weeks for spare parts to be delivered. “We can generate replacement parts with a device small and light enough to be carried in a backpack,” says D. Shannon Berry, an operations research analyst in the US Army’s Space and Missile Defense Command.

How 3D-printed guns and drones are changing weaponry and warfare
AR-15 rifle with 3D-printed lower receiver

Soon, frontline soldiers could be printing entire weapons or even aircraft. Engineers from MITRE, a corporation that carries out research for US government agencies, recently teamed with University of Virginia students to design, print and fly a smartphone-controlled drone, at a cost of just a few thousand dollars.

“I absolutely see 3D-printed drones being the norm in the not-too-distant future,” says University of Sheffield academic Neil Hopkinson, who’s been researching additive manufacturing since the 1990s and believes the military will be one of the first sectors to benefit from the technology. “One of the beauties of additive manufacturing is its diversity of applications. Within the military, I see it being used to make everything from personalised shoe soles to parts for vehicles.”

But if it’s so easy for soldiers to print gun parts, what’s to stop civilians from doing the same? Last year, US hobbyist Michael Guslick attached a 3D-printed plastic lower receiver – the only part of a gun that actually requires a licence in the US – to an AR-15 rifle before firing off 200 test-rounds. Meanwhile libertarian activists Defense Distributed announced plans to disseminate blueprints for a homemade DIY gun. Led by Texan law student Cody Wilson, the group aims to develop a fully printable plastic firearm adapted for basic desktop 3D printers [unveiled this week] and is already sharing files for individual components through its DEFCAD web forum.

How 3D-printed guns and drones are changing weaponry and warfare
Defense Distributed plans to disseminate blueprints for DIY guns

The increased accessibility of 3D printing technology is a “double-edged sword”, says Ronen Kadushin, a pioneer of the open-design philosophy, which aims to turn industrial design into a networked community unhindered by ownership and copyright restrictions. “It’s frightening for governments now, because it means the total dissemination of arms into the community. You can print ammunition for your own army.” Kadushin predicts that amateur designers could eventually suffer the same vilification as computer hackers do today. “All you need is one person to make a 3D-printed weapon and kill somebody with it. This is a very dangerous situation.”

Neil Hopkinson is less convinced of the threat posed by hobbyists. “The costs of the equipment, and the levels of skill and expertise you’re going to need, are high,” he says. “Those sorts of things just aren’t going to be accessible to the general public.”

Looking further into the future, Liam Young, co-founder of design and research studio Tomorrow’s Thoughts Today, suggests digital piracy could be an issue for the arms industry in the same way it has been for the entertainment industry. “Black-market economies will turn the illicit arms trade into a 3D-printed supply chain,” he suggests. “And these supply chains are going to be co-opted – not by Apple or Microsoft or whoever owns the digital rights to these weapons, but by organised-crime syndicates.

“It’s going to be complicated and messy,” he continues. “And it’s going to change things fundamentally – but perhaps not in the way we’re expecting.”

Main image: An AR-15 rifle, the weapon US hobbyist Michael Guslick managed to 3D-print a key part for last year, transforming it into a fully functioning firearm

  • Jakob Form

    “It’s frightening for governments now, because it means the total dissemination of arms into the community. You can print ammunition for your own army.”

    Or you’d rather buy it for cheap money in any third world country. I don’t see how that makes a difference. It’s probably as painful and deadly to be killed by a 3D printed gun. On the other hand one could get famous for being the first human killed by 3D-printed ammo.

    Question: What makes one an expert/pioneer of 3D-printing technology and open-design?

    Apparently shallow speculation and a fertile imagination is enough. Just being one of the first designers to talk about a topic doesn’t necessarily result in meaningful comments. Anyway, the topic is interesting, it’s just lacking some proper ‘experts’.

  • Pablo

    We’re still pretty far from being able to print a fully usable weapon. Parts, yes, but you would be able to carve them out of wood if you wanted, given the time and resources.

    3D printing weapon parts is huge for the army, because it means fixing stuff very easily, and with less logistics. But let’s get real, a usable gun barrel is not nearly close to being printed out of a desktop 3D printer and neither are bullets.

    Maybe there will be a day when 3D printers do it, but so far, the only thing that could get close to making a proper barrel would be metal sintering after printing with metallic ink, and that’s a pretty complex and expensive procedure. It’s much easier to just go buy a shotgun in Walmart.

  • anonymous coward

    Cody Wilson is right in choosing a pistol to prove a point; it’s the ultimate instrument of control. It does not, however, mean total dissemination of arms into the community, because I can already buy a CZ pistol for 1200 euros in a shady Rotterdam bar. I don’t need a printer for that.

    The legal road to obtain a CZ costs me just 600 euros max, but I can’t use that pistol to protect myself. For that I need a government, which absolutely positively will not be there when I need them. All Wilson is showing is that getting control over my own life has become a lot easier. It’s up to the individual, not longer government, to use that freedom wisely.

  • Paco

    How awkward will that be if such frontlines move into our cities?

  • the man

    This is yellow journalism. The author and ‘experts’ clearly do not understand the capabilities and limitations of 3D printing in its current state. The fact that one very educated individual put together a gun made 98% with a 3D printer and successfully fired it is news; the next news item will most likely not be a murder but a story about some kid who dropped $1300 on a printer, $500 on materials, spent a week printing, sanding and assembling a gun he found on the internet, and then blowing his own hands off trying to fire it. These are not professional products assembled by trained workers, they are plastic toys for a hobbyist.

    And, unless I missed a huge breakthrough, how is anyone printing ammo? Plastic bullets? Plastic casings? Plastic gunpowder and caps? Ridiculous.

    There will always be these crazies who use new technology in destructive ways. Better to focus on the ones who are doing absolute magic with them. Go find the TED talk about the guy using 3D printed scaffolding to grow bladders, oesophagi and working heart valves.

  • Charles Eames once said that design is a process that leads to a solution. His military experience led to progressive, practical and beautiful products. Sad to see the day has come when such designs make destruction, ugliness, and regression of humanity easy and assessible.

    When will someone make a peace treaty open source and easily printable for all?