BIG's 8 House succeeds where the Smithsons' "streets in the sky" failed, says Bjarke Ingels

| 19 comments

Danish architect Bjarke Ingels claims his Copenhagen housing development has accomplished the social mission Brutalist architects Alison and Peter Smithson set out to achieve with their "streets in sky" concept in the 1960s and 1970s.

Named 8 House because of its angular figure-of-eight plan, BIG's building dips and rises at the corners to create a dramatically sloping roof form.

The complex contains a mixture of housing, shops, offices and a kindergarten all connected by sloping walkways that stretch down to a central courtyard.

Bjarke Ingels on the Smithsons
Bjarke Ingels says BIG's use of sloping pathways in 8 House achieves the social mission that the parallel routes in the Smithsons' Robin Hood Gardens failed to

These elevated walkways or "streets in the sky" follow the Smithsons' post-war model for flats connected by public pathways, which they believed would encourage social interaction between residents.

"The Smithsons tried to realise this and I think they never really succeeded," said Bjarke Ingels, during a talk at the Royal Institute of British Architects earlier this week. "I think maybe because the connection to the ground was actually sort of covered over."

"I think here that a seamless continuation of the public realm has made it incredibly lively," he added.

The Smithsons attempted to put their concept into practice at the Robin Hood Gardens estate in London, with mixed results. Critics have since blamed the Smithsons' design for antisocial behaviour on the estate, and the local council now intends to replace the structures with new housing.

Bjarke Ingels on the Smithsons
BIG's housing scheme features a continuous cycle path and pedestrian walkway, and grassy knolls in the centre. Photograph by Jens Lind

Ingels believes that providing more direct access to the ground level with sloping – rather than parallel – walkways has made 8 House more successful.

A courtyard at the centre of the 8 House scheme features a series of grassy knolls not dissimilar to those at the centre of Robin Hood Gardens.

"Not only do we optimise the conditions for the individual programmes but we also elevate the social space," said Ingels. "You end up getting almost small-scale community life happening inside a big building."

But Ingels said he was sceptical that this type of project could work outside "semi-socialist" Copenhagen, particularly when he was commissioned to design a similar "courtscraper" scheme for Manhattan.

"Housing is a major aspect for creating the framework for our lives and I often get this objection that the kinds of projects we're doing only work in semi-socialist Scandinavia," he said.

The "streets in the sky" idea was first proposed by French Modernist architecture Le Corbusier, and a number of the Smithsons' contemporaries also tried to create housing using similar concepts. These schemes are now among some of the most ill-fated social housing projects in Britain.

Bjarke Ingels on the Smithsons
The latest bid to grant listing status to the Brutalist Robin Hood Gardens estate in east London failed in August 2015, and a local MP has called for it to be brought down. Photograph by Luke Hayes

An unsuccessful preservation campaign to save Robin Hood Gardens from demolition was backed by a number of high-profile architects including Zaha Hadid, Robert Venturi, Richard Rogers and Toyo Ito.

Prime minister David Cameron recently pledged to overhaul or demolish 100 of the UK's "brutal" housing estates from the post-war period, describing their design as a "gift to criminals and drug dealers".

His comments prompted warnings that the UK was at risk of inflicting an architectural "tragedy" on itself.

Bjarke Ingels spoke during a series of lectures to mark Zaha Hadid being awarded the 2016 Royal Gold Medal this week. She is the first female architect in 167 years to win the prize without a male counterpart.

  • Derek_V

    It succeeds because it is for rich people.

    • Jürgen

      Not really. The prices are among the lowest in the central Copenhagen area.

      • LOW

        It’s because it is not in central Copenhagen, it’s waaaaaaaaaaaaay out near Tarnby.

  • ii

    “I’m the best architect in the world”, says Bjarke Ingels.

  • Bob Terry

    Time will tell.

  • banal-ism

    Mediocrity…

  • Atlas

    Let’s wait and see if it actually works. For a start that courtyard looks dark and closed, which never bodes well for social housing.

  • Ian Nairn

    This guy really does love to blow smoke out of his own chimney. Anyway, doesn’t he essentially rebut himself here?

    “Ingels said he was skeptical that this type of project could work outside ‘semi-socialist’ Copenhagen.”

    Different polity and different prospects. Robin Hood Gardens’ failure can be laid far more squarely at the foot of council miss-management than anything so architectonically concrete as the Smithson’s obfuscation of the connection between walkway and ground.

  • Durgen Jensen

    It really doesn’t look like the kind of place I would like to live! But I guess I am not semi-socialist so that makes sense.

  • Archi-Nerd

    These pictures of the building with no people in them are not helping his argument.

    • Theo Tsesmatzoglou

      Actually in order to get pictures with people, you have to take them in the evening, otherwise it is a rather isolated building almost in the middle of nowhere.

  • tupadre

    There are better “iconic architecture” architects than Bjarke Ingels.

  • Dbz123

    The failure of social housing such as Robin Hood Gardens and the infamous Pruitt–Igoe in St. Louis has been studied for some time. In Oscar Newman’s book Creating Defensible Space, 1972: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defensible_space_theory

    The failure of this architecture was a total misunderstanding of social, monetary and spatial interactions and their consequences by architects. BIG’s project succeeds because it is for rich people. Mom surprised this is not mentioned whenever social housing issues are discussed. Instead this research is skipped and lessons lost.

    • Ian Nairn

      My mother was equally shocked.

  • hotte

    It is not fair to judge two very different projects. Copenhagen has nothing to do with social housing. It’s a complete (upper-) middle-class complex in the upper-middle-class area of Ørestad. Lots of kids, lots of jobs, lots of good life.

    One should not compare a 15 floor block on Central Park with one in the suburbs of Paris either. The first one will be clean every day, I promise! ;-)

  • Steven Fleming

    BIG’s aerial street extends out of the real street, which sure beats having to find the street by taking a lift.

    But then that could be said for Park Hill in Sheffield, which has the added advantage of giving all the apartments, not just half, access from the main gallery.

    • LOW

      The “streets” in the 8 Tallet actually never hit the ground, and you are forbidden to go up that slope.

  • Paul Lloyd Johnson

    Robin Hood Gardens was praised when it opened, only to suffer vandalism, not by residents, but by locals that didn’t live there out of jealousy. It was then gated off, but by that point the building was already being neglected.

    Let’s not pretend that the cheap housing estate that they will build in its place will not suffer from the same neglect.

  • Leo

    He says 8 house is lively but the photos show no liveliness whatsoever. He should read Jan Gehl.