Here are some photographs of Mathieu Lehanneur’s domestic “refrigerator-aquarium” called Local River, on show at Artists Space Gallery in New York.
The aquarium breeds freshwater fish for eating and grows vegetables in glass domes, which help to purify the water.
The concept allows people to rear food at home, thereby reducing the environmental impact of industrial fishing.
See our previous story for more information.
–
Posted by Rose Etherington
Gotta be honest…. I like this!
May 10th, 2008 at 11:49 amThat’s bad ass!
May 10th, 2008 at 12:19 pmI also want a home ran on electric eels!
“The aquarium breeds freshwater fish for eating and grows vegetables in glass domes, which help to purify the water…”
May 10th, 2008 at 4:45 pmPerhaps just a little more information is required to make a reasonable judgement, but in the meantime, we think it highly unlikely that this would fulfill the stated function.
In fact, this must be a humourous entry: it’s naivety is so profound that the only other explanation is that it is the musings of a 6 year old.
“The concept allows people to rear food at home, thereby reducing the environmental impact of industrial fishing…” - especially hilarious. How much aquarium space and glass bowl vegetable gardens would you need to sustain an average family, rearing fish from spawn to maturity? Do you think that the conditions these fish are kept in could constitute animal cruelty? Why don’t we just learn to eat and enjoy domestic dogs?
Its just abot the glass bowls isn’t it?
It is sad that when faced with a legitimately urgent topic of food availability and sustainability, the best ‘designers’ can come up with is this cynical, glib nonsense. It is an insult to the notion and philosophy of design, lazy thinking and disrespect for an audience that they obviously believe is too stupid to see behind their bad ideas.
I second Bonzo’s thoughts.
May 10th, 2008 at 6:48 pmThis conceptual work is completely taking the piss.
This is perverse! Without any sense for nature!
May 10th, 2008 at 7:28 pm@Bonzo: I see this more as an experiment. I also think the intentions of the experiment are positive. Ok, the esthetics are more important than the results in this case, but a lot of times these experiments lead to better products. Give it a chance.
May 10th, 2008 at 7:33 pmshape op the vase is stolen from the Bouroullec brothers
May 10th, 2008 at 9:43 pmhttp://www.bouroullec.com/img/book_1.jpg
lacks a sense of realism but is a great experiment.
these things (design?product…?) exists and are created in order to suggest an option/lead to future thoughts.
I think its a wonderful project.
Its just non-sellable, non-realistic, non-problem solving, non-sustainable, and perhaps.. not a product.
May 10th, 2008 at 10:49 pmGive it a chance to experiment a new option ( see elastic mind in Moma), french and world “design is dead” as STARk said….
May 11th, 2008 at 10:06 ami’m not agree with tiffani the shape is different from Bouroullec’s vase…only the same shape is protected
May 11th, 2008 at 10:08 amd’ plant pot is nice, but d’ fish tank is too blank. like some rocks ind “river bed”, some water plants etc…just to make d’ river is friendly to d’ fish…
May 11th, 2008 at 1:51 pmme gustaria saber la web de contacto para comprar estas plantas. saludos desde españa.
May 11th, 2008 at 9:21 pm@J…I do agree. Maybe it’s yet not the best idea, but what matters is the designer took an action. And actions create reactions which eventually create more actions and so forth.
A world’s a better place when people keep pushing for the better. Ben Franklin had a point when he flew a kite with a key in the midst of the storm. And you would have laughed at his stupid experiment. Perhaps all pessimists in Dezeen should learn to start shaping their critics into something concrete and show us how they can come up with something better here (if they can come up with something at all), or at least learn the term ‘good critics.’
Negative, pointless critics which suggest no alternatives are idiotic, and should be put aside.
May 12th, 2008 at 6:05 amlehanneur is french but do not follow Starck… he is in one future of design
May 12th, 2008 at 8:55 amYou could also said that the vase looks like this
May 12th, 2008 at 10:53 amhttp://equatorlive.com/blogs/jjjj/files/2007/11/hayon-wingback.jpg
Who is copying who? Hayon copied Bourollec?
He is on the cover of the french design magazine Intramuros ( text also in english)
May 12th, 2008 at 12:36 pmhttp://www.intramuros.fr/nportrait1.html
Joaquin
May 12th, 2008 at 2:34 pmSo drug designers for instance, or car designers, or airplane designers, they are allowed to just “take action” and watch the ‘reaction’? Or do these industries consider the brief carefully and research and publish/produce only when they are quite assured that they have reached a reasonable conclusion? I object to over simplification and lazy responses. You either take it seriously; or you do not. If you do not take important issues seriously, if you choose to publish something not even quarter baked - fine. But be prepared for approporiate ‘idiotic’ criticism.