
Following requests from readers of our earlier story, we have now got hold of the full set of images in the Flooded London series by Squint/Opera.

The images depict imaginary scenes in London in 2090, when rising sea levels have inundated the city.

See the earlier story for a full explanation of the project from Squint/Opera, plus details of where you can see them exhibited in London this month.





–
Posted by Marcus Fairs




June 22nd, 2008 at 6:38 pm
These are optimistic images. Even though London is hopelessly flooded, they have seemingly taken the effort to replace the white oak floor in the Tate modern with a walnut.
June 22nd, 2008 at 8:09 pm
believe me Marcus Fairs, you is good for design stuff, only !!!!
June 22nd, 2008 at 8:21 pm
as·ton·ish·ing
June 23rd, 2008 at 2:53 am
That water is crystal clear. Looks like a wonderful place to live.
June 23rd, 2008 at 3:23 pm
Can’t wait for global warming to improve the London weather.
June 23rd, 2008 at 4:06 pm
Looks like they’re all happy camping. But I think the reality will be far less pleasant. No more Underground. Utilities like clean water, sewer, gas and electric become problematic. Hundreds of millions of coastal refugees fleeing to higher ground, only to make life all the more miserable for the people who already live there. Not a world I would look forward to.
June 25th, 2008 at 10:23 pm
could do for an excellent illustration of J. G. Ballard’s book.
June 28th, 2008 at 12:23 am
I love it, these are amazing pictures.
June 28th, 2008 at 1:42 am
As well they should. Walnut does the Tate much better, IMHO.
June 28th, 2008 at 2:04 am
Wonderful talent.
Alarmist bullshit.
ABS FTW.
June 28th, 2008 at 6:25 am
Incredibly creative - great vision!
June 28th, 2008 at 3:46 pm
Didn’t recognize a thing, and I only left London 40 years ago after 20 years there, so you can see how it’s all ALREADY changed!
(iwmpop) mr le marquis.
June 28th, 2008 at 6:29 pm
Alarmist bullshit. ?
I think not.
June 28th, 2008 at 6:55 pm
Oh, come on - “millions of coastal refugees”?
75% of the world’s population would probably have died out already from starvation (due to loss of farmland) and subsequent resource wars.
Sheesh, Chuck. Get a grip.
(On the other hand, global warming trends are always followed by varyingly precipitous global cooling trends - read “Ice Ages” - so the pics are just a fantasy after all. Now if everyone in the images were wearing mukluks while ice fishing…)
June 28th, 2008 at 10:11 pm
Fee, figh, foe, fum! I smell the rub-a-dub of some English sea scum! You blokes knew what you were getting into when you sailed from Anglia and Saxony to Britain, then occupied by the Romans and Celts. It’s been a good 1600 years — your empire reached around the globe and spawned a country that would ultimately dissolve into the grey goo of George W. Bush. Time to pack it in and head for the highlands of Wales and Scotland!
June 30th, 2008 at 12:18 pm
Nice one, but we saw the opposite future in 2039 - no water left in our version.
Check Year 2039 photogallery at:
http://www.ciklopas.com/tomas.htm
July 1st, 2008 at 2:21 am
Does EVERYTHING have to reflect the New Socialist Realism or whatever? Does every piece of art have to show the dystopian future? Sure, if things go south and we can’t make artificial fertilizer we’ll lose three or four billion people to starvation in the first two years, but after that things will settle down and there’ll be time for fishing and tinkering with bicycles and diving off balconies. And little girls will still wear white dresses and play hide and seek. If you want to look at paintings of mass graves and famines, paint ‘em yourself.
And quit whining. You sound like my grandmother.
July 5th, 2008 at 3:01 pm
Maybe the white oak at the Tate was irreparably water stained?
July 16th, 2008 at 5:55 pm
Those CGI guys have been busy ! The technology still is not quite there, everything looks a bit to clean and glossy but keep trying.
July 21st, 2008 at 3:13 pm
Stunning stuff! I’d imagine the water, especially in the St. Mary’s plate, to be MUCH dirtier though as London is not the cleanest of cities! I think my favourite is the St. Paul’s one.