Libeskind drove a pointed steel and glass shard through the skin of the historic museum to create new galleries on five floors and a 30 metre-high rooftop viewing platform.
When we originally published the story, many readers were outraged with the design, with one commentor suggesting it to be like a giant axe cutting through the building.
Critics also had a lot to say. Architecture journalist Rowan Moore described the building as both "breathtaking" and "breathtakingly dumb", while critic Mary Lane compared it to "a piece of shrapnel freshly fallen from the sky" - read more about the critics opinions here.
Another controversial museum we've published recently is the heavily criticised Museum of Liverpool - read more about that project here.
See also: more stories about museums.
- Paul Eluard Cultural Centre by OFF Archi…tecture and Duncan Lewis Scape Architecture
- Architects "haven't learned" how to conn…ect skyscrapers to the public realm, says Safdie
- Wangjing Soho by Zaha Hadid Architects
- Interpretation centre for the Manzanares… River by Rubio & Alvarez-Sala Architects
- Crescent House by Andrew Burns
- Haptic adds a pair of extensions to a Vi…ctorian home in west London
- Archium's Urban Hive tower has a perfora…ted facade modelled on honeycomb
- House at Wategos Beach by Mackay + Partn…ers
- Dezeen's A-Zdvent calendar: House M by A…E5 partners
Sign up for a daily roundup
of all our stories