The Bow by
Foster + Partners

| 16 comments
 

Foster + Partners has completed a 58-storey bowed tower in Calgary, Canada (+ slideshow).

Dezeen_The Bow by Foster + Partners_7

At 247 metres, The Bow is the tallest building in the city, and the tallest tower in Canada outside of Toronto.

Dezeen_The Bow by Foster + Partners_1

Climate analysis helped to determine the form of the tower, with a concave facade on the south side facing the sun and a convex surface reducing the load of prevailing winds on the other side.

Dezeen_The Bow by Foster + Partners_3

A triangulated grid structure with sections spanning six storeys braces the building and helps to reduce the visual mass of the surfaces. "Every aspect, from the raised floors to the diagrid structure, is designed to be highly efficient," says Nigel Dancey, a senior partner at Foster + Partners.

Dezeen_The Bow by Foster + Partners_19

A series of atria occupy the space behind the concave facade, helping to insulate the building and reduce energy consumption.

Dezeen_The Bow by Foster + Partners_21

Three skygardens projecting into the atria provide social spaces for staff in the offices that occupy the building, featuring mature trees, meeting rooms, catering facilities and lifts.

Dezeen_The Bow by Foster + Partners_17

A system of enclosed walkways links The Bow, which is located in the city's downtown district, to the surrounding buildings so locals can avoid the harsh winter climate.

Dezeen_The Bow by Foster + Partners_11

On the ground level, a publicly accessible space contains shops, restaurants and cafes.

Dezeen_The Bow by Foster + Partners_2

Foster + Partners is working on two residential skyscrapers for a mixed-use development in north London and a riverside development in Lambeth featuring three towers of different heights – see all architecture by Foster + Partners.

Dezeen_The Bow by Foster + Partners_5

Photography is by Nigel Young.

Dezeen_The Bow by Foster + Partners_13

Here's some more information from the architects:


Official opening of The Bow, Calgary’s tallest tower

Special events have been held in Calgary this week to mark the official opening of The Bow, a 237- metre-high headquarters tower – the city’s tallest building and Canada’s tallest tower outside Toronto.

Dezeen_The Bow by Foster + Partners_10

A bold new landmark on the skyline, the project is equally significant in urban, social and environmental terms: the public base of the tower is filled with shops, restaurants and cafes and extends into a generous landscaped plaza, while the office floors are punctuated by three six-storey sky gardens, which encourage natural ventilation and help to significantly reduce energy use.

Dezeen_The Bow by Foster + Partners_15

The Bow is the first major development on the east side of Centre Street, a major axis through downtown Calgary, and it provides a shared headquarters for Encana and Cenovus.

Dezeen_The Bow by Foster + Partners_16

The building’s form was shaped by analysis of the climate and organisations. The tower faces south, curving towards the sun to take advantage of daylight and heat, while maximising the perimeter for cellular offices with views of the Rocky Mountains. By turning the convex facade into the prevailing wind, the structural loading is minimised, thus reducing the amount of steel required for the inherently efficient diagrid system.

Dezeen_The Bow by Foster + Partners_6

Each triangulated section of the structure spans six storeys, helping to visually break down the scale of the building.

Dezeen_The Bow by Foster + Partners_14

Where the building curves inwards, the glazed facade is pulled forward to create a series of atria that run the full height of the tower. These spaces act as climatic buffer zones, insulating the building and helping to significantly reduce energy consumption. As each floor plate has been sized to accommodate a whole business unit, there was a need to promote collaboration across the companies and bring a social dimension to the office spaces.

Dezeen_The Bow by Foster + Partners_18

Vertical access to the office floors is therefore directed through three spectacular sky gardens, which project into the atria at levels 24, 42 and 54 and incorporate mature trees, seating, meeting rooms, catering facilities and local lift cores. Staff facilities in these atria are complemented by an auditorium at the very top of the building.

Dezeen_The Bow by Foster + Partners_8

The Bow also establishes lateral connections with surrounding buildings. The tower is fused at two points to Calgary’s system of enclosed walkways, which offers a retreat from the city’s harsh winters.

Dezeen_The Bow by Foster + Partners_20

The second floor is open to the public and integrates shops and cafes, and with the only public connection over Centre Street, the scheme completes a vital pedestrian link in the downtown network. Externally, the building’s arc defines a large landscaped public plaza, at the heart of which is a landmark sculpture by Spanish artist, Jaume Plensa.

Dezeen_The Bow by Foster + Partners_4

Nigel Dancey, Senior Partner, Foster + Partners: “The tower’s form was shaped by the unique Calgary climate – facing south, the building curves to define a series of spectacular light-filled six-storey atria, with mature sky gardens, cafes and meeting areas, which bring a vital social dimension to the office floors. This principle extends to the base of the tower, which is highly permeable, with a +15 enclosed bridge connection to downtown, an atrium of shops and cafes and a fantastic new plaza. Every aspect, from the raised floors to the diagrid structure, is designed to be highly efficient. The Bow is a bold new symbol for Calgary, and is testament to the strength of our team and excellent local relationships.”

Dezeen_The-Bow-by-Foster-+-Partners_90

The Bow, EnCana and Cenovus Headquarters
Calgary, Canada 2005 – 2013

Client: H+R Real Estate Investment Trust
Appointment: 2005
Construction Start: 2007
Completion: 2013
Site area: 17,500m2 / 188,300ft2
Area (gross external): 199,781m2 / 2,149,644ft2
Typical Floor Area (net): 3,584m2 / 38,564ft2
Height: 236m / 774.3ft
Number of Floors: 58
Structure: Steel-braced moment frame with a diagrid
Capacity: 4000
Facilities: Offices, Public plaza, Retail facilities
Parking facilities: 1360 car spaces
Materials: 39,000 tonnes of steel was used; 900,000ft2 of glass was used
Sustainability: The building’s form deflects the prevailing winds, allowing for a lighter structure
The solar heat collected in the atrium is redistributed throughout the year by means of extraction during winter and heat exchange during summer, reducing the load on the mechanical systems
3 x 6 storey-high “Sky gardens” with natural vegetation at levels 24, 42 and 54
Large glazed areas reduce the need for artificial lighting Heat redistribution system
Displacement ventilation via a raised floor

Client: H+R Real Estate Investment Trust
Tenant: Encana and Cenovus
Developer: Matthews Southwest Developments
Architect: Foster + Partners
Foster + Partners Design Team: Norman Foster, David Nelson, Spencer de Grey, Nigel Dancey, James Barnes, Julia Vidal Alvarez, Laura Alvey, Tim Bauerfeind, Jakob Beer, Karin Bergmann, Mattias Bertelmann, Stephen Bes,t Federico Bixi,o Marie Christoffersen, Vasco Correia, Kirsten Davis, Ulrich Hamman, Michelle Johnson, Arjun Kaicker, Sabine Kellerhoff, Chiu-Ming Benny Lee, Mathieu Le Sueur, Shirley Shee Ying Leung, Alissa MacInnes, Carsten Mundle, Florian Oelschlager, Cristina Perez, Susanne Reiher, Diana Schaffrannek, Anja Schuppan, Carolin Senfleben, Robert Smith, Eva Tzivanki

Collaborating Architect: Zeidler Partnership
Structural Engineer: Yolles
Civil Engineer: Kellam Berg
Mechanical Engineers: Cosentini
Main contractor: Ledcor Construction
Fire Consultant: Leber Rubes
Vertical Transport Consultant: KJA
Acoustic Consultant: Cerami
Cost Consultant: Altus Helier
Lighting Consultant: Claude Engle Lighting Design
Landscape Consultant: Carson McCulloch
Planning Consultant: Sturgess Architecture
Environmental Consultant: Transolar
Wind Engineer: RWDI
Transportation Engineer: DA Watt
Signage Consultant: Cygnus
Code Consultants: Leber-Rubes
Art Consultant: Via Partnership
Artist: Jaume Plensa
Cladding: Brook Van Dalen

  • Wow

    Awful. No doubt a scheme left in the back of a sketchbook until they could find someone dumb enough to peddle it too. A small, yet insulting nod to a Rogers building with the diagonal bracing, which has been somehow smashed into an early 1990s Fosters building.

    • jatchua

      Exposing and exaggerating the exterior structural details is not unique to Richard Rogers, but an entire architectural style for skyscrapers around the world. I feel it’s tastefully futuristic yet the gestalt reminds me of Viljo Revell’s design for Toronto’s CIty Hall.

    • http://www.bothamdesign.com Chris

      How is diagonal bracing intellectually owned by Rogers? What about the Gherkin, Hearst, Vivaldi, etc? Foster is no stranger to the diagrid.

      The unfortunate thing is the concave surface suffers aesthetically from the large facets, which no doubt was done to align with the spacing of the diagrid braces, but ends up undermining the continuity of the surface. This is in contrast to the aforementioned Toronto City Hall building, which curves gracefully throughout its concave surface.

    • Aaron

      This isn’t their best work, but by definition not every building can be (I do wonder how many of the commenters on Dezeen have any experience of the constraints and compromises of working in the real world).

      Yes, it’s not a brilliant building but take a look at the appalling architecture surrounding it. People need to get a grip with regards to ‘awful architecture’. The world would be blessed if even 10% of commercial buildings were designed and constructed to this standard.

  • Will

    What I would like on dezeen are projects which are exalting, amazing or just plain mind blowing. I could not care less about these projects, (that is not me saying this project is not very rounded and competent)I do not care about fame or reputation, buildings here should be on here on an individual merit basis.

    Let’s be honest: most of us will have forgotten this by tomorrow; I know it is pleasing but it is conformative and unmemorable. Please please please just give us the most inventive, strangest, wildest projects which explore solutions to large, important or humanistic problems.

    • Johannas

      Will, who are you and why should we care what you do and do not want to see? So naive!

      Just to build, let alone an icon this prominent on a city skyline, is a success. Who knows what kind of programmatic, urbanistic, zoning and client restraints informed the arc, structure or shape.

      To judge and dismiss purely by glance is the pitfall of the our new, architectural blog-consumerist community. Congratulations, you represent the problem.

    • Aaron

      I agree with Will in that I’m not much interested in these kinds of projects – although I also don’t assume that Dezeen is only here to serve my interests.

      But, if contemporary architecture suffers from anything it’s an obsession with relentless novelty – the ‘inventive, strangest (and) wildest’. The works I see on this blog that deeply engage with important and humanistic problems eschew architectural faddish and are rooted in a deep sense of historical continuity, material sensitivity and humanist values (Peter Zumthor springs to mind).

      If more architects would gaze backward just occasionally they might do better at solving what are the largely enduring problems of humanity with regards to the build form.

    • Silky Johnson

      Will, you represent the problem of our archietctural blog community, as Johannas said. And please, don’t add more to the to-be-forgotten train you seem to be riding so comfortably.

      Wildest and strangest according to whom? What is your criteria to evaluate what is most inventive? And how do wildest projects tackle solutions that are humanistic?

  • Nick

    I disagree with the comments above.

    While the massing also reminded me of Toronto City Hall, let’s keep in mind that the scale of that building is significantly less (roughly a third of the size). The shape of Revell’s project is highly metaphorical, while here we have a straightforward and substantial explanation for the shape – wind loading, daylighting, and space (large 6-storey atria, well placed in the section). The scale and the ambitions for the concave elevation are enough to necessitate the diagrid structure (in my opinion). Chris, you make a good point about the facets, but I suppose I don’t mind the discontinuity of the large surface.

    Will, your point has nothing to do with this building. “Strange and wild” projects often do very little to actually ‘explore’ real-world solutions, with the exception of a few. I applaud Dezeen for publishing these types of projects in particular – nicely executed and intelligently designed buildings. This project is not forgettable, but a good example of contemporary large-scale tower design. Have a look at the vast majority of recently built towers (offices, condos) in most North American cities if you want forgettable. I find this project to break from the vanilla just enough – similar to what Revell’s building does in Toronto – making it a bit of an icon that I think will last.

    And no, I do not work for Foster, but I do appreciate the work of his office in general.

  • Sara

    Not offensive but boring, conservative and I think a missed opportunity to really do something special with the skyline. Too bad.

    Good critical article to read about Foster and Partners is Designing a Second Modernity by Hal Foster in the book The Political Unconscious of Architecture edited by Nadir Lahiji.

  • Alexios Charitakis

    Guys, it’s just another ugly building. Don’t let its size make you believe it’s great. Even a little kid with imagination and the list of associated bodies (structural, civil, wind, mechanical engineers, etc.) can design and build a better building than this. It’s true that since Norman stepped down as leader of his firm we see very few good buildings. I suppose this is what happens to any commercialised architectural firm that is too big to control and lacks a good leader.

    Their collective experience, resources and talent helps them guarantee an above average result – nothing more. Great architecture is a matter of luck nowadays for F+P.

    • Jon

      You speak the truth, my friend.

  • Trav

    I don't believe that the conditions exist in every project for a scheme to become "a cathedral", and our standards are highly skewed by the blogosphere. Forget the tallness or diagrid-ness or similarities with other schemes – this is a very high standard for what it is, a scheme servicing a largely conservative corporation (ie. this company wanted maximum office space – a non-negotiable aspect of the program).

  • Stuart

    Truly horrific! This is what happens when you design from CAD.

    • studio

      At least it wasn’t a Gehry!

  • Laura

    Here in Calgary, it’s actually a pretty nice building compared with a lot of the surroundings. It is very appropriate for the surroundings and named after the Bow river which runs beside it.

    Overlooking the Bow at night, when lit up, is nice. That’s more than I can say for the public art that looks forced (at most) right in front of the building.