Moscow's Mercury City overtakes The Shard
as Europe's tallest skyscraper

| 24 comments

Mercury City

News: Moscow skyscraper Mercury City topped out today and has overtaken Renzo Piano's The Shard as the tallest building in Europe.

According to buildings analyst Emporis, the tower surpassed the 310-metre-height of Piano's London tower in September and it now stands at 339 metres tall.

The tower is one of five Russian skyscrapers in the list of ten tallest buildings in Europe, while Moscow is also the city with the most high-rise buildings on the continent. As an expert in large-scale construction projects, Emporis reports that the property boom there can be credited to a number of factors. "Many Russian and foreign investors focus on prestigious building projects," said analyst Matthew Keutenius. "Furthermore, there are less building regulations in Moscow than in other European metropolises."

Mercury City

Featuring a shimmering facade of golden glass, Mercury City was designed by Russian architect Mikhail Posokhin and the late American architect Frank Williams, and is due to be inaugurated in early 2013.

However, its reign as tallest building will likely be short-lived, as under construction nearby is the planned 506-metre Federation Tower, which is set to complete next year.

Compared with skyscrapers globally, Europe's buildings are still relatively small. The tallest building in the world currently is the SOM-designed Burj Khalifa in Dubai, which at 828 metres is almost 500 metres higher than Mercury City. Construction has also started on the Kingdom Tower in Jeddah, which will be over 1000 metres high once complete.

See more stories about skyscrapers »

One Response to Moscow's Mercury City overtakes The Shard
as Europe's tallest skyscraper

  1. Niño says:

    My god that’s ug-lee.

  2. Akeel says:

    Beats The Shard in height, not in design.

  3. matei23 says:

    Just a bit taller, but whole lot uglier.

  4. 3DD says:

    Now seeing this I actually think the Shard is a very nice building.

  5. Proof that height is no qualifier for design or beauty.

  6. Aaron says:

    I think it’s quite a good materialisation of the sentiments of Russian politics and culture at this moment in history. It should also be given credit for being the first transformer that turns into a building.

  7. DanieleR says:

    I didn´t know Moscow was in Europe…

  8. Max says:

    It looks surprisingly good on these photos. It's much uglier in real life.

  9. CrazyDazy says:

    The Shard is ugly as well.

  10. europe says:

    Moscow is not Europe.

  11. Tom says:

    Kind of funny that a building by an architect associated so much with a city of capitalism, New York, ends up being the tallest building in Moscow.

  12. I see that Tron Legacy was a huge hit in Russia :P

  13. Chris says:

    Like a stretched-out version of The Mirage. Only needs an enormous fountain display and casino!

  14. Alain Baudelaire says:

    Is CCCP sky tower! Nothing has changed!

  15. Ilya says:

    Pretty standard ugly skyscraper.

  16. tyler says:

    1985 called. They want their terrible architecture back.

  17. Anton says:

    Moscow is my hometown and it is just sad to see such ugly architecture going up.

  18. Really? says:

    SINCE WHEN DID RUSSIA BECOME PART OF EUROPE? Why stop there? China is right next to Russia, is China part of Europe too?

  19. Mona says:

    I have no idea why so many negative people put their comments here, but I think it’s a quite lovely and successful modern design. I think it looks beautiful.

  20. DEE H says:

    Since when is Moscow in Europe…?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>