Organic Skyscraper by Chartier-Corbasson
would be built from office rubbish

| 5 comments
 

A conceptual design for a London skyscraper by Paris studio Chartier-Corbasson Architectes proposes using waste generated by workers already in the building to help construct new floors as demand grows.

London Organic Skycraper by Agence Chartier Corbasson

Chartier-Corbasson Architectes developed the concept for an office tower in response to a brief from high-rise architectural awards organisation SuperSkyScrapers, which invited proposals for an "organic skyscraper" suited to construction in London.



Aiming to highlight inefficiencies in the current system of speculative office tower development, the architects wanted to design a self-generating structure that extends incrementally as demand for space increases.

"At present in Europe a lot of skyscrapers are stopped because of a lack of investors," architect Thomas Corbasson told Dezeen. "The amount of construction is so huge that it is very difficult to find the money. With our proposal, you can divide the basic investment by two or three."

London Organic Skycraper by Agence Chartier Corbasson

To enable the potential for organic growth, the architects based the design on bamboo scaffolding used throughout the construction industry in Asia.

Tubes of a uniform diameter and length would be used for the skyscraper's structural framework, negating the need for a tower crane and ensuring the only processes required on site would involve fixing prefabricated elements together.

Wind gusting against the facade would be directed through the hollow tubes towards generators fitted inside to generate energy for the building.

London Organic Skycraper by Agence Chartier Corbasson

The towers would be designed with a predetermined shape and height, but built in stages depending on the amount of office space that has been sold.

London Organic Skycraper by Agence Chartier Corbasson

"We don't need giant towers, we just need towers that are at the right size at the right moment to absorb the new populations," Corbasson suggested. "A lot of towers and office buildings are empty because they represent only an investment and not a social response."

Waste generated by the office workers, such as paper and plastic bottles, would be processed within the building to create other necessary building elements including floor plates and facade panels.

London-Organic-Skycraper-by-Agence-Chartier-Corbasson_dezeen_468_5

The architects propose constructing the lower storeys using discarded materials from the construction sites of other towers close to the proposed site in Shoreditch.

Reconditioning plants would be positioned at the top of the building to transform the waste from the offices into construction materials used to extend the structure upwards in a constant self-generating process.

Lifts running through the core would transport waste from the offices to the reconditioning centre, and on to the new level under construction.

London Organic Skycraper by Agence Chartier Corbasson

It would be possible to relocate the reconditioning plants further up the building when required, although a permanent facility would also be located on the ground floor.

Further collection points for materials such as glass that would need external processing would be positioned at the base of the tower.

London Organic Skycraper by Agence Chartier Corbasson
Section one – click for larger image

At ground level, the building's section would be rhombus-shaped to accommodate facilities such as conference spaces and meeting rooms, with the sides converging towards the top where an observation deck could be positioned above the offices.

Arranging the central lifts in a pyramidal formation would provide landing areas on different levels that could be used for communal facilities including cafes, bars and fitness centres.

London Organic Skycraper by Agence Chartier Corbasson
Section two – click for larger image

Chartier-Corbasson Architectes developed the proposal in collaboration with facade engineering specialists VS-A and received a special mention in the competition. They are currently seeking investment in order to develop prototypes.

  • alex

    … but why should it look like the Shard?

    • mitate

      Piano is an innovator. We should all revere innovators and disregard imitators.

  • Design crimes

    But wait, the vast majority of waste generated by these offices will be paper and plastic, drinks bottles etc. Neither can be used structurally to support another floor, so the waste cannot be used as suggested to generate structural materials to build another level. Significant funding will still be needed for steel girders, concrete etc.

    The article suggests the office waste will be used for floor tiles and room dividers, and anything like glass will still have to be sent off site. Why not send it all off site, streamline separation, reduce dust and have better production, whilst collecting material from other skyscrapers to increase production etc and selling surplus materials back to the industry for other buildings?

    Even if the scaffolding is bamboo as used for years in other countries (again hardly revolutionary) this will have to be imported in, so loses the environmental benefit if there was any, and you’d also have to fly in a special team to work with the bamboo, losing local jobs.

    So what have we got? A design that in looks and layout is the same as every other skyscraper, that encourages its workers to create waste, and is flimsily held together by ill-conceived environmental ideas – but it got a special commendation!

  • Design crimes

    Edit: I misread the bamboo scaffolding part of the article so please ignore this paragraph.

  • Mook

    “the architects wanted to design a self-generating structure that extends incrementally as demand for space increases.” So you will always have an unfinished looking building. I thought the reason skyscrapers were finished before offices moved in was because it’s much harder to sell space when there’s still noisy construction work going on on the floor above.

    “Tubes of a uniform diameter and length would be used for the skyscraper’s structural framework, negating the need for a tower crane.” The tubes still have to get up to the latest level, so are they being helicoptered up? A crane seems the most efficient way, unless you can take them up through the centre of the building. But that would need a big lift.

    “A lot of towers and office buildings are empty because they represent only an investment and not a social response.” So let’s fill those first, negating the need for another skyscraper.

    “The architects propose constructing the lower storeys using discarded materials from the construction sites of other towers close to the proposed site in Shoreditch.” I’m not sure which other construction sites nearby would have not budgeted correctly to have enough suitable material lying around to build a few lower storeys.